Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread vs concat vs unshift vs push
(version: 0)
spread vs concat vs unshift
Comparing performance of:
arrayUnshift123 vs arrayConcat123 vs arraySpread123 vs arrayPush123
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = [1,2,3];
Tests:
arrayUnshift123
array.unshift(0);
arrayConcat123
array = array.concat([0])
arraySpread123
array = [0, ...array]
arrayPush123
array.push(0);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
arrayUnshift123
arrayConcat123
arraySpread123
arrayPush123
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **What is tested?** The benchmark tests four different ways to add an element to the end of an array in JavaScript: `unshift`, `concat`, `push`, and `spread`. The test creates an initial array with three elements `[1,2,3]` using the script preparation code. **Options compared:** The options being tested are: * `array.unshift(0)`: adds an element to the beginning of the array * `array = array.concat([0])`: concatenates the current array with a new array containing the element `[0]` * `array = [0, ...array]`: spreads the elements of the original array and prepends the new element using the spread operator (`...`) * `array.push(0)`: adds an element to the end of the array **Pros and Cons:** Here's a brief overview of each option: * **`unshift`**: This method modifies the original array in place, which means it doesn't create a new array. It can be faster than other methods because it only updates a single index, but it also affects the entire array. If you want to preserve the original order of elements, `push` might be a better choice. * **`concat`**: This method creates a new array by concatenating the current array with the new element. While this creates a new array, it can be faster than other methods because it doesn't modify the original array. However, creating a new array can be memory-intensive for large datasets. * **`spread`**: This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by spreading the elements of the original array and prepending the new element. Like `concat`, this creates a new array but is generally faster because it's more lightweight. However, it can be slower than `push` if you need to update the length of the array. * **`push`**: This method adds an element to the end of the array without modifying the original array. It creates a new array on each call, which can lead to memory growth over time. **Library:** There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark. However, some browsers may have built-in optimizations or performance features that affect how these operations are executed. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None of the provided options use special JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or async/await with generators. The benchmark only focuses on basic array manipulation. **Other considerations:** When writing benchmarks for array manipulation, it's essential to consider factors like: * Memory allocation and deallocation * Cache performance (e.g., how the browser caches array elements) * Compiler optimizations (e.g., inlining or tree shaking) * Garbage collection overhead Measuring these factors can provide a more comprehensive understanding of an operation's performance. **Alternative approaches:** To improve your benchmarking strategy, consider exploring other optimization techniques like: * **Micro-optimizations**: Focus on specific aspects of the code that might have a significant impact on performance, such as reducing memory allocation or minimizing function calls. * **Warm-up and calibration**: Run multiple iterations to ensure accurate results and account for initial execution overheads. * **Parallelization**: Use concurrent execution methods (e.g., multi-threading or parallel processing) to take advantage of modern CPU architectures. * **High-performance libraries**: Leverage specialized libraries like WebAssembly, SIMD instructions, or dedicated GPU acceleration.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
concat vs unshift vs spread
unshift vs spread vs concat
spread vs concat vs unshift22
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (new try)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?