Benchmark: Test1212312415 - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var max1 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)
var max2 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)

var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max1; i++) { arr.push(i); }

var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { arr2.push(i); }

var arr3 = [];
//for (var i = 0; i <= max3; i++) { arr3.push(i); }

Tests:

JS Concat
arr.concat(arr2);
_.concat
_.concat(arr,arr2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JS Concat
_.concat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Lodash.js vs Nativeыы
Lodash.js vs Native isArrary
Test native unique
Lodash.js vs Native MAGIC
Lodash.js vs Native1

Test1212312415 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JS Concat vs _.concat

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JS Concat

_.concat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results