Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.isEqual vs Array.join() Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of integers.
(version: 0)
Test on isEqual performance
Comparing performance of:
_.isEqual vs Array.join()
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.foo = [14003548, 14003515, 14003547, 14003518, 14003517, 14003521, 14003520, 14003519, 14003522, 14003523, 14003524, 14003525, 14003340, 14003492, 14003491, 14003514, 14003513, 14003511, 14003512, 14003509, 14003508, 14003507, 14003494, 14003493, 14003495, 14003496, 14003497, 14003498, 14003499, 14003501, 14003500, 14003502, 14003503, 14003504, 14003531, 14003506, 14003505, 14003516, 14003510 ]; window.bar = [14003340, 14003491, 14003492, 14003493, 14003494, 14003495, 14003496, 14003497, 14003498, 14003499, 14003500, 14003501, 14003502, 14003503, 14003504, 14003505, 14003506, 14003507, 14003508, 14003509, 14003510, 14003511, 14003512, 14003513, 14003514, 14003515, 14003516, 14003517, 14003518, 14003519, 14003520, 14003521, 14003522, 14003523, 14003524, 14003525, 14003531, 14003547, 14003548 ];
Tests:
_.isEqual
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
Array.join()
window.foo.join() === window.bar.join()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.isEqual
Array.join()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested in this particular benchmark. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: `lodash.isEqual` and `Array.join()` for checking equality between shallow arrays of integers. The test data consists of two arrays, `foo` and `bar`, which contain a mix of duplicate and unique values. **Options Being Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)`**: This is the first benchmark case, which uses the `lodash.isEqual` function to compare the contents of the two arrays. `_.isEqual` is a utility function provided by Lodash that checks if two values are equal. 2. **`window.foo.join() === window.bar.join()`**: The second benchmark case uses the `join()` method on each array and compares the results using the strict equality operator (`===`). This approach concatenates the elements of each array into strings and then compares these strings. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **`_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)`**: + Pros: Efficient use of Lodash's optimized implementation for equality checks. + Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of importing and initializing Lodash. * **`window.foo.join() === window.bar.join()`**: + Pros: Simple and straightforward approach that leverages built-in JavaScript functionality. + Cons: Less efficient than `_.isEqual`, as it requires concatenating elements into strings, which can be slower. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors: * Performance: If speed is crucial, `lodash.isEqual` might be a better choice due to its optimized implementation. * Code complexity and readability: For more complex equality checks or when using Lodash functions extensively, `_.isEqual` can simplify code and reduce errors. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** In this benchmark, there isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being used. However, it's worth noting that the use of Lodash (`lodash.isEqual`) relies on importing a third-party library, which might not be desirable for all developers. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in alternative approaches, consider: * Using built-in `Array.prototype.every()` or `Array.prototype.includes()` methods, which can provide similar functionality to `_.isEqual`. * Implementing custom equality checks using simple loops and bitwise operations. * Leveraging other libraries or frameworks that offer optimized equality checks. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs regarding performance, code complexity, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.isEqual vs Array.toString() Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings.
Lodash.isEqual vs Array.join() Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings.
Lodash.isEqual vs join Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings.
Lodash.isEqual vs ES6 Sets Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of numbers.
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?