Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Key generation depending on data types
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Numbers first vs Letter second vs No letters
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.a = 35.185033 window.b = 135.185033 window.c = 23 window.d = 'N'
Tests:
Numbers first
const sum = a + b + c + d
Letter second
const sum = a + d + b + c
No letters
const sum = a + b + c
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Numbers first
Letter second
No letters
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases, explaining what's being tested, the pros and cons of different approaches, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of JavaScript key generation depending on data types. The script preparation code defines four variables: `a`, `b`, `c`, and `d`. Variable `d` is a string (`'N'`), while `a`, `b`, and `c` are numeric values. **Test Cases** There are three test cases: 1. **Numbers first**: The script tries to sum up the numbers `a`, `b`, `c`, and `d`. This case tests how the JavaScript engine handles concatenation of numeric literals. 2. **Letter second**: Similar to the previous case, but with a twist: after adding up the numbers, the script adds the string variable `d` ( `'N'` ) as the last operand in the sum operation. This test case checks how the engine handles a mix of numeric and string literals during concatenation. 3. **No letters**: This is a baseline test where only the numeric variables are used in the sum operation. **Library Usage** None of the test cases explicitly uses any JavaScript libraries or frameworks, so no additional library-specific optimizations or considerations apply. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmark doesn't specifically target or use any unique JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard arithmetic operations and string concatenation. Therefore, no special handling is required for features like ES6 classes, async/await, or template literals. **Performance Considerations** When evaluating these test cases, consider the following factors: * **Concatenation efficiency**: The order in which numbers and strings are concatenated affects performance. In JavaScript, when concatenating strings with numeric values, the engine first converts the numbers to strings, performs the concatenation, and then converts the result back to a number if necessary. * **Number ordering**: When concatenating multiple numbers (as in `a + b + c + d`), the order of operations might matter due to operator precedence rules. In this case, the engine will first add up the numbers, which is likely an efficient operation. * **String handling**: The addition of a string (`d`) as a separate operand can lead to additional overhead due to the need for string conversion and concatenation. **Alternative Approaches** To optimize these benchmark results: 1. **Minimize concatenation overhead**: Consider using built-in functions like `Number(a) + Number(b) + c` instead of `a + b + c`, which avoids unnecessary string conversions. 2. **Optimize number ordering**: If the order of operations affects performance, consider rearranging the equation to group numbers together (e.g., `(a + b + c) + d`). 3. **Use caching or memoization**: If certain values are computed frequently, consider using caching or memoization techniques to avoid redundant calculations. Keep in mind that these optimizations might not significantly impact the results of this specific benchmark, as the focus is on basic arithmetic operations and string concatenation.
Related benchmarks:
compare lodash isequal at 5 levels deep
set spread vs. generator
Lodash Array isEqual vs Native
Switch vs map (100)
Object.keys vs for-in
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?