Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary vs or operator
(version: 0)
Quickest operation to return smaller of 2 numbers
Comparing performance of:
Math.min vs if vs ternary vs OR
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
this.numberA = Math.random() * 1000; this.numberB = Math.random() * 1000;
Tests:
Math.min
return Math.min(this.numberA, this.numberB);
if
if (this.numberA) return this.numberA; else return this.numberB;
ternary
return this.numberA ? this.numberA : this.numberB
OR
return this.numberA || this.numberB
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math.min
if
ternary
OR
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The test aims to measure the performance of different approaches to determine the smaller of two numbers: `Math.min()`, an if-else statement, a ternary operator, and an OR operator. The goal is to find the quickest operation that achieves this task. **Options Compared** 1. **Math.min()**: A built-in JavaScript function that returns the smallest of two or more numbers. 2. **If-Else Statement**: A control structure used to execute different blocks of code based on conditions. In this case, it's used to compare `numberA` and `numberB` and return the smaller one. 3. **Ternary Operator**: A shorthand way to express a conditional statement using three parts: condition, true value, and false value. 4. **OR Operator**: The bitwise OR operator (`|`) is being tested in this context, which returns 1 if either of the operands is non-zero. **Pros and Cons** * **Math.min()**: + Pros: Built-in function, optimized for performance. + Cons: May not be suitable for all use cases (e.g., when numbers are very large). * **If-Else Statement**: + Pros: Easy to understand and implement. Can handle complex conditions. + Cons: Slower than built-in functions like `Math.min()`. * **Ternary Operator**: + Pros: Concise and easy to read. Suitable for simple conditions. + Cons: May be slower than if-else statements or bitwise OR operators. * **OR Operator**: + Pros: Simple and efficient for bitwise operations. + Cons: Not designed for comparison of numbers, which can lead to unexpected results. **Library** None explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, some browsers might use additional libraries or functions that are not part of the standard JavaScript implementation. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark does not seem to rely on any special features or syntax beyond what is typical for JavaScript (e.g., no ES6+ features like arrow functions, async/await, or template literals). **Alternatives** To measure performance differences in similar scenarios: 1. Use the `performance.now()` API to measure execution times. 2. Create a more comprehensive benchmark with additional test cases and variations (e.g., testing different data types). 3. Run the benchmark on various platforms, browsers, and hardware configurations to ensure robust results. Keep in mind that benchmarking is an essential part of software development, and measuring performance differences can help you make informed decisions about code optimization strategies.
Related benchmarks:
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary operator
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary operator for Int
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary operator vs logical or
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary operator test 2
Math.min vs if/else vs ternary operator test 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?