Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ASDAtleas6 Characters
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Testis vs Testis double asterisk
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Testis
parseInt("1"+"0".repeat(3),2)
Testis double asterisk
2**3
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Testis
Testis double asterisk
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its components. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark, hosted on MeasureThat.net, allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark is represented by a JSON object that contains various information about the test case. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The first part of the benchmark definition is an empty JSON object with four properties: * `Name`: This property specifies the name of the benchmark. * `Description`: This property is optional and can be used to provide a brief description of the benchmark. In this case, it's null. * `Script Preparation Code`: This property is optional and can be used to specify any code that needs to be executed before running the test case. In this case, it's null. * `Html Preparation Code`: This property is also optional and can be used to specify any HTML code that needs to be executed before running the test case. In this case, it's null. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark definition also contains an array of individual test cases. Each test case has two properties: * `Benchmark Definition`: This property specifies the actual JavaScript code that will be executed during the benchmark. * `Test Name`: This property is used to identify each test case individually. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. `parseInt("1"+"0".repeat(3),2)`: This test case measures the execution time of the `parseInt` function with a specific input value. 2. `2**3`: This test case measures the execution time of the exponentiation operator (`**`) on the number 2. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare different approaches to measuring execution time: 1. The first test case, `parseInt("1"+"0".repeat(3),2)`, uses a string that is repeated using the `repeat()` method and then converted to an integer using the `parseInt` function. This approach tests the performance of the `parseInt` function. 2. The second test case, `2**3`, uses exponentiation operator (`**`) to calculate 2 raised to the power of 3. This approach tests the performance of the exponentiation operator. **Pros and Cons** Both approaches have their pros and cons: * Using `parseInt` has the advantage of providing a precise control over the input value, but it can be slower due to the additional string manipulation. * Using exponentiation operator (`**`) is often faster since it's a native operation in JavaScript, but it may not provide the same level of control as using `parseInt`. **Special JS Features** Neither of the two test cases uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. The exponentiation operator (`**`) was introduced in ECMAScript 2016. **Library and Purpose** There is no library used in this benchmark definition. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to MeasureThat.net, some options include: * Browserbench: A benchmarking tool that allows you to compare the performance of different browsers. * Google Benchmark: An open-source benchmarking library that provides a simple way to write and run benchmarks. * WebPageTest: A tool that measures the performance and responsiveness of websites across different devices and networks. I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
Related benchmarks:
UTF-8 byte length Arabic 4-mthods
random id gen
Encode byte string test (string concatenation vs. map join)
TextDecoder vs String.fromCharCode Big
String from Charcode cached (deg)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?