Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
first
(version: 0)
first
Comparing performance of:
jquery vs js
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="hello"> <p class="apple"></p> <p class="pair"></p> </div> <script src="jquery-3.2.1.min.js"></script>
Tests:
jquery
$(".pair")
js
document.getElementsByClassName(".pair")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jquery
js
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark for you. **What is tested:** MeasureThat.net is testing two JavaScript microbenchmarks: 1. The first test case uses jQuery's `$()` function to select an element with the class `pair`. The benchmark measures how fast this function can be executed. 2. The second test case uses the native JavaScript method `document.getElementsByClassName("pair")` to achieve the same result as the jQuery function. **Options compared:** The two test cases are comparing the performance of using a library (jQuery) versus the native JavaScript method. **Pros and Cons:** Using a library like jQuery can provide several benefits: Pros: * Easier to write code, especially for complex DOM manipulations * Provides a standardized way of selecting elements * Often includes additional features and utilities Cons: * Adds overhead due to the need to load and initialize the library * May not be suitable for all use cases or performance-critical applications On the other hand, using native JavaScript methods can provide benefits like: Pros: * Faster execution times since there is no overhead from loading a library * More control over the code's behavior Cons: * Requires more code and expertise to write correct and efficient implementations * May not be as standardized or consistent across browsers **Library:** In this case, jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a simple way to select elements on a web page. It allows developers to manipulate the DOM (Document Object Model) in a convenient and readable way. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmarks. The test cases are using standard JavaScript methods and jQuery's `$()` function, which is a widely supported and familiar API. **Other alternatives:** If you want to use alternative libraries or native JavaScript methods for selecting elements, here are some options: * Vanilla JavaScript: You can use `document.querySelectorAll(".pair")` or `Array.prototype.filter.call(document.getElementsByClassName("pair"), element => element.classList.contains("pair"))` instead of jQuery. * React: If you're building a React application, you might use the `useRef` hook to get a reference to an element and then use the `current` property to access its DOM node. * Virtual DOM libraries like React or Preact: These libraries provide a virtual representation of your UI that can be updated efficiently when state changes. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, syntax, and usage patterns compared to jQuery.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery vs vanilla JS in selector class
Test selectors
querySelectorAll data attribute vs class name - larger DOM
tooltip get
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?