Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object spread vs New map entries
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Obj spread vs new Map
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var data = new Array(100000).fill(undefined).map((_,i) => i) var obj = data.reduce((obj, idx) => {obj[idx] = idx; return obj}, {}); var map = new Map(Object.entries(obj));
Tests:
Obj spread
let a = {...obj};
new Map
let a = new Map([...map.entries()]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Obj spread
new Map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches to creating objects from an existing object: 1. **Object Spread**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to create a new object with entries from the original object. 2. **New Map Entries**: Creating a new Map instance and adding entries using `Map` constructor, which takes an array of key-value pairs. **Script Preparation Code:** The script preparation code is used to set up the environment for the benchmark: ```javascript var data = new Array(100000).fill(undefined).map((_,i) => i) var obj = data.reduce((obj, idx) => {obj[idx] = idx; return obj}, {}) var map = new Map(Object.entries(obj)) ``` This code creates an array of 100,000 elements with indices from 0 to 99,999. It then reduces the array into a single object using the `reduce` method and assigns each index as its corresponding value. **HTML Preparation Code:** There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that this benchmark only tests JavaScript engine behavior and does not involve any DOM-related operations. **Test Cases:** The individual test cases are defined in the "Benchmark Definition" section: ```javascript [ { "Benchmark Definition": "let a = {...obj};", "Test Name": "Obj spread" }, { "Benchmark Definition": "let a = new Map([...map.entries()]);", "Test Name": "new Map" } ] ``` These test cases create a new object by spreading the `obj` object and assigning it to variable `a`. The second test case creates a new Map instance from the entries of the original `map` object. **Library:** The `Map` data structure is a built-in JavaScript library, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It provides a way to store key-value pairs and allows efficient lookup, insertion, and deletion of elements. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** * The spread operator (`...`) is used in the "Obj spread" test case. This feature was introduced in ES6 and allows creating new objects by spreading existing objects. * The `Map` constructor is also part of the ES6 standard. **Options Compared:** The benchmark compares two options for creating a new object: 1. **Object Spread**: Using the spread operator to create a new object with entries from the original object. 2. **New Map Entries**: Creating a new Map instance and adding entries using `Map` constructor, which takes an array of key-value pairs. **Pros and Cons:** * **Object Spread**: + Pros: Fast, lightweight, and easy to implement. + Cons: May not be as efficient for large datasets due to the overhead of object creation. * **New Map Entries**: + Pros: Efficient for large datasets, allows for fast lookup and insertion of elements. + Cons: Requires additional memory and can be more complex to implement. **Other Alternatives:** If you want to test other approaches to creating objects, here are some alternatives: 1. Using the `Object.assign()` method to create a new object by assigning entries from an existing object. 2. Creating a new object using the `{}` syntax with key-value pairs assigned directly. 3. Using a library like Lodash's `_.cloneDeep()` function to clone an existing object. These alternatives can be tested in additional benchmark cases, allowing for more comprehensive testing of JavaScript engine behavior and performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign (to empty object) performance
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign with empty obj performance
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance to merge into new object
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance with empty object as first key
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance (create new objects)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?