Benchmark: Lodash.js vs Native Raphael

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var max1 = 100000; // 100,000 (100 Thousand)
var max2 = 10000000; // 10,000,000 (10 Million)
var max3 = 100000000; // 100,000,000 (100 Million)

var arr1 = [];
//for (var i = 0; i <= max1; i++) { arr1.push(i); }

var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { arr2.push(i); }

var arr3 = [];
//for (var i = 0; i <= max3; i++) { arr3.push(i); }

Tests:

Native2
for (let element of arr2) { element = element*2; };
Lodash.js filter
_.each(arr2, function (element, index) { element = element*2; });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native2
Lodash.js filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of different approaches to achieve a specific result is essential in software development, and MeasureThat.net provides a great platform for benchmarking JavaScript code.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests two approaches: native JavaScript and Lodash.js.

* The `Script Preparation Code` defines three arrays (`arr1`, `arr2`, and `arr3`) with increasing sizes (100,000, 10,000,000, and 100,000,000 elements, respectively). These arrays are populated using a simple loop.
* The `Html Preparation Code` includes the URL of the Lodash.js library, which will be used in the benchmark.

The individual test cases are:

1. **Native2**: This test case uses native JavaScript to iterate over `arr2`, multiplying each element by 2.
2. **Lodash.js filter**: This test case uses Lodash's `_.each` function to iterate over `arr2`, multiplying each element by 2.

**Options Compared**

In this benchmark, two main approaches are compared:

1. **Native JavaScript**: The native JavaScript approach uses a simple loop to iterate over the array and perform the desired operation.
2. **Lodash.js**: Lodash's `_.each` function is used to iterate over the array and perform the desired operation.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **Native JavaScript**:
	+ Pros: Lightweight, easy to understand, and does not require an external library.
	+ Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of type checking, loop unrolling, or other optimizations.
* **Lodash.js**:
	+ Pros: Provides a convenient and well-maintained function for iterating over arrays, reducing code duplication.
	+ Cons: Requires an additional library download, which may introduce latency.

**Library: Lodash.js**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for various tasks, such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this benchmark, the `_.each` function is used to iterate over the array and perform the desired operation.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that Lodash.js provides various functions for working with arrays, such as `_.map`, `_filter`, and `_reduce`, which may be useful in other benchmarking scenarios.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking to measure the performance of different approaches to achieve a specific result, consider the following alternatives:

1. **V8 Benchmark Suite**: A collection of benchmarks that test various JavaScript engines, including V8 (used by Google Chrome).
2. **JavaScriptPerf**: A benchmarking tool specifically designed for measuring JavaScript performance.
3. **Benchmarking frameworks**: Libraries like Benchmark.js or micro-benchmark allow you to write and run custom benchmarks with ease.

Keep in mind that the specific approach and library used will affect the results of your benchmarking efforts. It's essential to choose the right tools and methods to ensure accurate and meaningful comparisons.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash.js vs Native Raphael (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native2 vs Lodash.js filter

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native2

Lodash.js filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):