Benchmark: for vs for (with length) vs for (reverse with length) vs every vs forEach with small array 2

Script Preparation code:

function generateTestArray() {
	var result = [];

	for (let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
		result.push({
			a: i,
			b: i / 2,
			r: 0,
		});
	}

	return result;
}

var array = generateTestArray();

Tests:

for
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { array[i]; }
for (reverse with length)
var length = array.length; for (var i = length; --i >= 0;) { array[i]; }
some
array.some(function(i) { array[i]; return false; });
every
array.every(function(i) { array[i]; return true; });
forEach
array.forEach(function(i) { array[i]; });
for (with length)
var length = array.length; for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) { let r = array[i]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for
for (reverse with length)
some
every
forEach
for (with length)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Regular for vs forEach
Loop Test (forEach vs for)
foreach vs for...of
for of vs forEach with console log
For loop vs <Array>.forEach() vs for...of loop

for vs for (with length) vs for (reverse with length) vs every vs forEach with small array 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for vs for (reverse with length) vs some vs every vs forEach vs for (with length)

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

for

for (reverse with length)

some

every

forEach

for (with length)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results