Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
how-to-insert-a-string-at-a-specific-index-in-javascript 2
(version: 1)
Benchmark.js
Comparing performance of:
slcie vs splice
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Go to the latest result
Tests:
slcie
let origString = "GeeksGeeks"; let stringToAdd = "For"; let indexPosition = 5; newString = origString.slice(0, indexPosition) + stringToAdd + origString.slice(indexPosition);
splice
let origString = "GeeksGeeks"; let stringToAdd = "For"; let indexPosition = 5; // Split the string into individual // characters origString = origString.split(''); // Insert the string at the index position origString.splice(indexPosition, 0, stringToAdd); // Join back the individual characters // to form a new string newString = origString.join('');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slcie
splice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 121 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
slcie
12.2M/s
splice
4.2M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
slcie
12,172,210 Ops/sec
splice
4,175,572 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested on the provided JSON and explain the different approaches used in the benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a set of two test cases, each measuring the performance of inserting a string at a specific index in JavaScript. The first test case, "slcie," uses the `slice()` method to create a new string by taking a subset of the original string and concatenating it with another string. The second test case, "splice," uses the `splice()` method to insert the string into the original string. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two different approaches: 1. **`slice()` method**: This approach creates a new string by taking a subset of the original string using `slice()`. It then concatenates the inserted string with the remaining part of the original string. 2. **`splice()` method**: This approach modifies the original string in-place and inserts the string at the specified index using `splice()`. The resulting string is not stored, so it's only valid for a single execution. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **`slice()` method**: + Pros: Creates a new string with minimal overhead, can be more efficient for large strings. + Cons: Can lead to unnecessary memory allocations if the resulting string is not used immediately. * **`splice()` method**: + Pros: Modifies the original string in-place, reduces memory allocations. + Cons: Can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of modifying the string. **Library** Neither of the test cases uses any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines, like V8 (used by Google Chrome), have built-in optimizations for certain operations, such as string manipulation. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. They only use standard JavaScript language elements and methods. **Other Alternatives** If you were to implement this benchmark yourself, some alternative approaches could include: 1. **Using `concat()` instead of `slice()`**: This would concatenate the inserted string with the original string using the `concat()` method. 2. **Using a temporary array and `join()`**: Instead of creating a new string using `slice()`, you could create a temporary array with the characters of the original string and then join them together using the `join()` method. 3. **Using a loop to insert the string**: You could use a loop to iterate over the characters of the original string and insert the inserted string at each index, rather than using `splice()`. Keep in mind that these alternatives might change the performance characteristics of the benchmark, so it's essential to test them thoroughly to ensure they meet your requirements.
Related benchmarks
Substring in a string: IndexOf vs Includes vs lodash includes
lodash _.indexOf vs native indexOf
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?