Benchmark: merge vs mergeWith vs object.assign vs spread12

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

lodash merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = _.merge(a, b); console.log('merge', c)
object.assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = Object.assign(a, b); console.log('assign', c)
spread
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = { ...a, ...b }; console.log('spread', c)
lodash mergeWith
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = _.mergeWith(a, b); console.log('mergeWith', c)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash merge
object.assign
spread
lodash mergeWith

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 22 hours ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash merge	137814.9 Ops/sec
object.assign	152090.5 Ops/sec
spread	132047.0 Ops/sec
lodash mergeWith	138193.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of four different methods for merging two objects: `merge`, `mergeWith`, `object.assign`, and `spread`. The tests are conducted using JavaScript and utilize the Lodash library, which provides utility functions for tasks such as array and object manipulation.

**Options Compared**

Here's a brief overview of each option:

* **`merge`**: This method merges two objects recursively. It returns a new object with the properties from both input objects.
* **`mergeWith`**: This method is similar to `merge`, but it takes an additional function as the first argument, which is called for each property in the source object. This allows for more control over the merging process.
* **`object.assign()`**: This is a built-in JavaScript method that merges two or more objects into one. It returns a new object with the properties from all input objects.
* **`spread` (also known as `Object spread operator`)**: This method creates a new object by spreading the properties of another object into it. It uses the syntax `{ ...obj }` to create a new object.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons for each option:

* **`merge`**:
	+ Pros: Simple, intuitive, and widely supported.
	+ Cons: Can lead to performance issues if dealing with large objects or complex data structures.
* **`mergeWith`**:
	+ Pros: Provides more control over the merging process, which can be useful in certain scenarios.
	+ Cons: Adds complexity and may require additional setup.
* **`object.assign()`**:
	+ Pros: Built-in method, widely supported, and simple to use.
	+ Cons: Can lead to issues with prototype chains or object inheritance.
* **`spread`**:
	+ Pros: Simple, intuitive, and modern syntax.
	+ Cons: Only available in recent browsers (ES6+), and may not work in older environments.

**Lodash Library**

The Lodash library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object merging, and more. The `merge` function is part of the Lodash library and is used to merge two objects recursively.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between these methods, consider the following factors:

* **Complexity**: If you need to deal with complex data structures or large objects, `mergeWith` might be a better choice.
* **Performance**: If performance is critical, `object.assign()` and `spread` are likely your best bets due to their optimized implementation.
* **Browser Support**: If you need to support older browsers, you may need to use alternative methods like `object.assign()` or `mergeWith`.
* **Syntax**: The syntax for each method can affect readability and maintainability. Choose the one that fits your team's coding style.

**Alternatives**

If none of these options work for you, consider using other methods:

* **`Array.prototype.reduce()`**: Can be used to merge objects by reducing an array of key-value pairs.
* **`JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))`**: A creative approach to merging objects by stringifying and then parsing the object as JSON.

However, keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the same level of control or performance as the methods listed above.

Related benchmarks:

merge vs mergeWith vs object.assign vs spread12 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread vs lodash mergeWith

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash merge

object.assign

spread

lodash mergeWith

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):