Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
merge vs object.assign vs spread1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
lodash merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = _.merge(a, b); console.log(c)
object.assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = Object.assign(a, b); console.log(c)
spread
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my', d: 'ss' }; var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 's2s' }; var c = { ...a, ...b }; console.log(c)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash merge
object.assign
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares three approaches to merge two objects: `_.merge` from Lodash, `Object.assign`, and the spread operator (`...`). The test creates two objects, `a` and `b`, with some common properties. It then merges these objects using each of the three approaches and logs the resulting object to the console. **Options Compared** 1. **Lodash merge**: This approach uses Lodash's `merge` function to combine the properties of `a` and `b`. Lodash is a utility library that provides various functions for tasks like array manipulation, string formatting, and object merging. 2. **Object.assign**: This approach uses the `Object.assign` method to create a new object with the properties of `a` and `b`. Object assign is a built-in JavaScript function that merges one or more source objects into a target object. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This approach uses the spread operator to merge the properties of `a` and `b`. The spread operator creates a new object by spreading the properties of an existing object. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Lodash merge**: Pros: * Provides more control over the merging process, as you can specify options like `deep: true` or `compatibilityMode`. * Handles complex cases like array merging and circular references. * Can be faster for large objects due to its optimized implementation. Cons: * Requires Lodash to be loaded, which may add extra weight to your application. * Has a higher learning curve compared to other methods. 2. **Object.assign**: Pros: * Built-in function, so it doesn't require any additional libraries. * Fast and efficient for simple object merges. * Supports most modern browsers. Cons: * Can be slower for large objects due to the overhead of creating a new object. * May not handle complex cases like array merging or circular references correctly. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: Pros: * Fast and efficient, as it creates a new object with minimal overhead. * Handles most simple case merging scenarios. * Part of modern JavaScript, so no additional libraries are needed. Cons: * Limited control over the merging process. * May not work correctly for complex cases like array merging or circular references. * Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully. **Additional Considerations** 1. **Performance**: The spread operator is generally the fastest approach, followed closely by `Object.assign`, and then Lodash's `merge`. 2. **Compatibility**: Make sure to test each approach in multiple browsers and environments to ensure compatibility. 3. **Code readability**: Choose the approach that best fits your codebase's style and conventions. **Other Alternatives** 1. **JSON merge**: Some implementations, like JSON Merge Patch (JMP), can be used for more complex object merging scenarios. 2. **Function compositions**: In some cases, function composition techniques like using `Object.keys()` or `for...in` loops can provide more control over the merging process. In summary, the benchmark compares three approaches to merge objects: Lodash's `merge`, `Object.assign`, and the spread operator (`...`). The choice of approach depends on factors like performance, compatibility, code readability, and the specific requirements of your project.
Related benchmarks:
lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread new obj
lodash.assign vs object.assign vs spread
lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread (no intermediate vars)
lodash assign vs object.assign vs spread operator - variable and constant
lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread (v2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?