Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
destructuring vs vars
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
vars vs destructuring
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
vars
const a = "popel"; const b = "nase"; const c = "huhu"; console.log(a, b, c);
destructuring
const { a, b, c } = { a: "popel", b: "nase", c: "huhu" }; console.log(a, b, c);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
vars
destructuring
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark, titled "destructuring vs vars", compares the performance of two ways to assign values to variables in JavaScript: using traditional variable declarations (`const a = "popel";`) versus destructuring assignment (`const {a, b, c} = {...}`). **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Traditional Variable Declarations**: Using `const` to declare and initialize variables directly. 2. **Destructuring Assignment**: Using the syntax `{a, b, c}` to extract values from an object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Traditional Variable Declarations**: + Pros: Simple, straightforward, and widely supported. + Cons: Can lead to verbose code, especially when working with multiple variables. * **Destructuring Assignment**: + Pros: More concise, easier to read, and can reduce the amount of code needed for complex assignments. + Cons: Requires knowledge of object destructuring syntax, which can be unfamiliar to some developers. **Library Used (None)** There is no external library used in this benchmark. The tests only rely on built-in JavaScript features. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses the **destructuring assignment feature**, which allows assigning values from an object to multiple variables in a concise manner. This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and is now widely supported by modern browsers and JavaScript engines. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark only measures the execution time of each test case, so any other factors that might affect performance, such as memory allocation or garbage collection, are not being considered. * The use of a fixed set of variables (`a`, `b`, and `c`) ensures that both tests have the same amount of data to process. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for assigning values to variables in JavaScript include: 1. **Function expressions**: Using functions to create and initialize variables, e.g., `const func = () => { return a; }; const b = func();`. 2. **Class fields**: Using class fields to declare instance properties, e.g., `class MyClass { constructor() { this.a = "popel"; } }`. However, these alternatives are not being compared in the provided benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Delete vs destructure for objects
let + delete vs deconstruct
Delete vs destructure for cloned objects
Delete vs destructure for objects in loop
Delete vs destructure for objects v2 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?