Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Testing
(version: 4)
Comparing performance of:
searchMostCommonNumber vs mostCommonNumber
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function searchMostCommonNumber(arr) { if (arr === void 0) { arr = []; } var current = 0; var max = 0; var mostCommonNumber = 0; var i; for (i = 0; i < arr.length - 1; i++) { var current_1 = 1; var j = void 0; for (j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) { if (arr[i] === arr[j]) { current_1++; } } if (current_1 > max) { max = current_1; mostCommonNumber = arr[i]; } } return mostCommonNumber; } function mostCommonNumber(numbers) { let map = new Map() for (let num of numbers) { map.set(num, (map.get(num) || 0) + 1) } let mostCommonNumber = NaN let maxCount = -1 for (let [num, count] of map.entries()) { if (count > maxCount) { maxCount = count mostCommonNumber = num } } return mostCommonNumber } numbers = Array(1e2).map(n => Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000))
Tests:
searchMostCommonNumber
searchMostCommonNumber(numbers)
mostCommonNumber
mostCommonNumber(numbers)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
searchMostCommonNumber
mostCommonNumber
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition is represented as a JavaScript function that calculates the most common number in an array of numbers. The function has two implementations: 1. `searchMostCommonNumber(arr)`: This function iterates through the array, counting the occurrences of each number. It keeps track of the maximum count and returns the corresponding number. 2. `mostCommonNumber(numbers)`: This function uses a Map data structure to count the occurrences of each number in the array. It then finds the key with the maximum value in the map. **Options Compared** The two functions are compared in terms of their performance, which is measured by the "ExecutionsPerSecond" metric. This metric represents how many times each function executes per second. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. `searchMostCommonNumber(arr)`: * Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and doesn't require additional data structures. * Cons: Has a time complexity of O(n^2) due to the nested loop, making it less efficient for large arrays. 2. `mostCommonNumber(numbers)`: * Pros: Uses a more efficient data structure (Map) with a time complexity of O(n), making it faster than the first approach for large arrays. * Cons: Requires creating a Map object and potentially modifying its size, which can be slower due to memory allocation. **Library/Functionality Used** Both functions use JavaScript's built-in `Array` and `Math` objects. The second function also uses a `Map` object from the JavaScript Standard Library, which is available in modern browsers and Node.js environments. **Special JS Feature/Syntax (Not Applicable)** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark functions. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches could be: * Using a different data structure, such as an object with numeric properties, to count the occurrences of each number. * Utilizing a library like Lodash or Ramda, which provide optimized implementations for common array and mapping operations. * Implementing a more efficient algorithm, such as counting only unique numbers and then finding the most common one. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant to this specific benchmark and might require additional changes to the code.
Related benchmarks:
Smallest Common Multiple
Map or GroupBy
FindLargestProduct
array math.max (3 variants) vs for loop (5 variants)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?