Benchmark: Test of 2.1 - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var data = [];
for (var i=0;i<10000;i++) {
  data.push({key: 'key' + i, value : 'value' + i})
}

Tests:

fomEntries
Object.fromEntries(data.map(({key, value}) => [key, value]))
reduce
data.reduce((acc, current) => { acc[current.key] = current.value; return acc; }, {});
for
let out = {}; for(let i=0 ; i<data.length ; i++) { out[data[i].key] = data[i].value; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
fomEntries
reduce
for

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmark analysis.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The provided JSON defines three microbenchmarks:

1. `Object.fromEntries(data.map(({key, value}) => [key, value]))`
2. `data.reduce((acc, current) => {\r\n      acc[current.key] = current.value;\r\n      return acc;\r\n    }, {})`
3. `let out = {};\r\nfor(let i=0 ; i<data.length ; i++) {\r\n  out[data[i].key] = data[i].value;}`

These benchmarks test different approaches to iterate over and populate an object.

**Options Compared**

The three benchmarks compare the performance of:

1. **Object.fromEntries**: A modern JavaScript method for creating objects from arrays of key-value pairs.
2. **reduce**: An array reduction method that accumulates values in an accumulator object.
3. **for loop with object iteration**: A traditional for loop iterating over the array and populating an object.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Object.fromEntries**:
	* Pros: concise, readable, and efficient (native implementation).
	* Cons: limited browser support (Chrome 103+), may not be suitable for large datasets.
2. **reduce**:
	* Pros: widely supported, flexible, and useful for various data processing tasks.
	* Cons: requires more code, may be slower due to unnecessary object cloning.
3. **for loop with object iteration**:
	* Pros: simple, easy to understand, and suitable for large datasets.
	* Cons: less concise and readable than other options, may be slower due to unnecessary array iterations.

**Library and Purpose**

The `Object.fromEntries` method uses the native JavaScript API, which is not explicitly a library but an built-in feature since ECMAScript 2017. The `reduce` method also relies on the native JavaScript API, while the for loop uses the built-in array iteration features.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark except for the use of template literals (`\r\n`) in the script preparation code and some minor differences in formatting between benchmarks (e.g., using semicolons instead of line breaks).

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to these benchmarks might include:

* Using `Array.prototype.forEach` with a callback function
* Employing a custom loop implementation, like a pointer-based iteration
* Leveraging libraries like Lodash or Ramda for data processing and manipulation

Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case, dataset size, and desired level of performance.

I hope this explanation helps!

Related benchmarks:

Test of 2.1 (version: 0)

test

Comparing performance of: fomEntries vs reduce vs for

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

fomEntries

reduce

for

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):