Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.keys().length vs Map.size
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.keys().length vs Map.size
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var data = new Array(100000).fill(undefined).map((_,i) => i) var obj = data.reduce((obj, idx) => {obj['idx' + idx] = idx; return obj}, {}); var map = new Map(Object.entries(obj));
Tests:
Object.keys().length
var size = Object.keys(obj).length
Map.size
var size = map.length
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.keys().length
Map.size
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The website provides a JSON object that defines a benchmark, which includes: * `Name`: The name of the benchmark, "Object.keys().length vs Map.size". * `Description`: An empty description, suggesting that no specific functionality is being measured. * `Script Preparation Code`: + Creates an array `data` with 100,000 elements filled with `undefined`. + Maps over the data using the `map()` method to generate an index for each element, and then uses the `reduce()` method to create a JavaScript object (`obj`) where each property is indexed by its corresponding value. + Creates a new Map (`map`) from the object's entries. * `Html Preparation Code`: Empty, indicating that no HTML setup is required. The script preparation code generates an object with 100,000 properties, which are then used to create both an object using the `Object.keys()` method and a Map using the `Map.size` property. The goal of this benchmark is likely to compare the performance of these two approaches for accessing and querying the size of an object. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"Object.keys().length"`: * Benchmark Definition: `var size = Object.keys(obj).length` * This test case measures the performance of using the `Object.keys()` method to get the length of the object. 2. **"Map.size"`: * Benchmark Definition: `var size = map.length` * This test case measures the performance of using the `Map.size` property to get the size of the Map. **Library and Special JS Features** Both test cases use built-in JavaScript methods: * `Object.keys()` is a method of the `Object` object, which returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property names. * `Map.size` is a property of the `Map` object, which returns the number of key-value pairs in the Map. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: 1. **"Object.keys().length"`: + Pros: Widely supported across browsers and platforms; easy to use. * Cons: May be slower than using `Map.size` due to the overhead of iterating over property names. 2. **"Map.size"`: + Pros: Can be faster than using `Object.keys()` since it directly returns the size, without iteration. * Cons: May not work in older browsers or environments that don't support Maps. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: * If you need to iterate over an object's properties for some reason (e.g., finding specific values), `Object.keys()` might be a better choice. However, this comes at the cost of potentially slower performance. * If you're working with large datasets and want to minimize overhead, `Map.size` is likely a better option. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to consider for accessing an object's size or size of a Map include: * Using `Object.entries()` and then getting the length of the resulting array (similar to `Object.keys()`) * Implementing your own custom method to get the size (e.g., by counting properties manually) * Using a library like Lodash, which provides the `size` function for objects and Maps.
Related benchmarks:
Object.fromEntries vs reduce vs Map + Array.from
Object.fromEntries vs create temp object vs Array.reduce
iterating from a filled object VS iterating from a map
array includes vs object key lookup, large arrays
Object.fromEntries(Array.map) vs Array.reduce (with different methods)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?