Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs jQuery merge vs test
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
jQuery merge
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = $.merge([1, 2], params);
test
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var arr = [ 1, 2 ]; var other = arr.push(...params);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
jQuery merge
test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares three approaches to concatenate an array with another array: 1. `Array.prototype.concat()` 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`) 3. jQuery's `$.merge()` function (for older browsers that don't support the spread operator) 4. A custom `push(...)` method **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these four approaches: * `Array.prototype.concat()`: a traditional method for concatenating arrays * The new ES6 spread operator (`...`): a concise way to concatenate arrays using the spread syntax * jQuery's `$.merge()` function: an older method for merging arrays, supported by jQuery but not native JavaScript * A custom `push(...)` method: a straightforward way to append elements to an array **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief summary: * `Array.prototype.concat()`: reliable, widely supported, but can be slower than other methods due to the overhead of calling a method on the prototype. * The new ES6 spread operator (`...`): concise, efficient, and widely supported in modern browsers. However, it may not work in older browsers or environments that don't support it. * jQuery's `$.merge()` function: an older method that works in some cases but can be slower than other methods due to the overhead of calling a method on the prototype. It's mostly deprecated in favor of native JavaScript methods. * Custom `push(...)` method: straightforward, efficient, and widely supported. However, it may not be as concise or readable as other methods. **Library Usage** In this benchmark, jQuery is used for its `$.merge()` function, which is a legacy method that was popular before the spread operator became widely adopted. This suggests that the benchmark is targeting older browsers or environments where jQuery is still relevant. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different methods for concatenating arrays, which is a fundamental operation in JavaScript programming. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to array concatenation, here are some options: * Using `Array.prototype.push()` with the spread operator (`...`): e.g., `arr.push(...params)` * Using a custom implementation of the concatenate method * Using other libraries or frameworks that provide optimized array concatenation methods (e.g., Lodash) * Experimenting with different algorithms for concatenating arrays, such as using a loop or recursion. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and compatibility with different browsers and environments.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?