Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.from() vs []
(version: 0)
Testing the difference between creating filled arrays.
Comparing performance of:
new Array() vs spread
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
new Array()
new Array(0)
spread
[0]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
new Array()
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **What is tested?** The benchmark tests two approaches to create an empty array: using the `new Array(0)` constructor and using the spread operator (`[]` with an initial value of 0). **Options compared:** 1. **`new Array(0)`**: This approach creates a new, empty array by calling the `Array` constructor with no arguments. 2. **`[]` with initial value 0**: This approach uses the spread operator to create a new array with an initial value of 0. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **`new Array(0)`**: * Pros: + Creates a new, empty array object. + Can be faster for large arrays since it avoids creating a temporary array. * Cons: + May not work correctly in older browsers or environments that don't support `Array` constructors. + Requires a specific syntax and constructor call. 2. **`[]` with initial value 0**: * Pros: + More familiar syntax for many developers. + Works in most modern browsers and environments. * Cons: + May create temporary arrays or objects during execution, which can be slower than `new Array(0)`. + Requires the spread operator (`[]` with an initial value), which may not be as familiar to some developers. **Library usage:** There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that `Array.prototype.slice()` and other array methods might be used implicitly in these tests (although not shown in the provided code snippets). **Special JS feature or syntax:** The benchmark uses a special JavaScript feature: the spread operator (`[]` with an initial value). This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and is widely supported by modern browsers. In summary, this benchmark tests two approaches to create empty arrays, comparing their performance. The `new Array(0)` constructor may offer a slight performance advantage but comes with syntax and compatibility limitations, while the spread operator (`[]` with an initial value) provides a more familiar syntax but might be slower due to potential temporary array creation. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative approaches to create empty arrays in JavaScript, you could consider: * Using `Object.create(null)` to create an object with no prototype chain. * Utilizing the `Array.from()` method (as shown in the benchmark) with an empty iterable or array literal as its argument. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and compatibility issues compared to the original approaches tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Array.from() vs new Array()
my Array.from() vs new Array()
Array.from() vs new Array() - empty
Array() vs Array.from() fill
Array.from() vs new Array() vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?