Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array elements adding 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
by index vs by push
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = ""; var i;
Tests:
by index
var sArr = Array(1000); for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) { sArr[i] = i; }
by push
var sArr = []; for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) { sArr.push(i); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
by index
by push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript code that creates an array of 1000 elements and populates it with indices from 1 to 1000. The array can be created either by using the `Array()` constructor with a length parameter or by using the `push()` method to add elements one by one. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"by index"`**: This test case uses the `Array()` constructor to create an array of 1000 elements and then populates it with indices from 1 to 1000 using a traditional for loop. 2. **"by push"`**: This test case uses the `push()` method to add elements one by one, starting from an empty array. **Comparison** The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches: * Using the `Array()` constructor vs. using the `push()` method **Pros and Cons** 1. **"by index"`**: * Pros: This approach creates the array upfront, which might be faster since it avoids the overhead of creating an empty array and then adding elements one by one. * Cons: If the array is larger than the available memory, this approach could lead to performance issues. 2. **"by push"`**: * Pros: This approach uses less memory since it creates an empty array that grows dynamically as elements are added. * Cons: This approach can be slower since it involves creating and destroying arrays during each execution. **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, the `push()` method relies on the built-in `Array.prototype.push()` function, which is a part of the JavaScript language standard. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: * If you need to create an array with a fixed size and don't plan to modify it often, using `Array()` might be faster. * If you need to create an array that grows dynamically or frequently, using `push()` might be more suitable. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for creating arrays in JavaScript include: * Using the spread operator (`[...array]`) to create a new array from an existing one * Using the `Array.from()` method to create an array from an iterable (e.g., a string, another array) * Using a library like Lodash or Ramda, which provide alternative array creation methods Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Add to array
Array Assignment
Add value to an array
teststest
teststest1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?