Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat with empty array (Fix Reference Error)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
concat with empty array vs concat without empty array
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
concat with empty array
let array = [1, 2, 3, 4]; array = [].concat(array, 5);
concat without empty array
let array = [1, 2, 3, 4]; array = array.concat(5);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat with empty array
concat without empty array
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and understand what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains metadata about the test. In this case, it has a few key fields: * `Name`: A human-readable name for the benchmark, which in this case is "concat with empty array (Fix Reference Error)". * `Description`: An optional field that provides a brief description of the test. Unfortunately, it's empty in this case. * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These fields are used to set up the environment for the test, but they're also empty. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark has two individual test cases: 1. **concat with empty array**: * The benchmark definition is a JavaScript script that creates an array `[1, 2, 3, 4]` and then assigns it to a new variable `array`. It then uses the `concat()` method to concatenate the original array with the number `5`, passing an empty array `[]` as the first argument. * The purpose of this test is likely to measure how browsers handle the concatenation operation when passing an empty array as an argument. 2. **concat without empty array**: * This benchmark definition is similar to the previous one, but it doesn't pass any arguments to the `concat()` method. **Options Compared** The two test cases are comparing different approaches to handling the concatenation operation: 1. When passing an empty array as an argument (`[]`). 2. When not passing any arguments at all (i.e., using only the `concat()` method with no arguments). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: * **Passing an empty array (`[]`)**: This approach can help identify issues related to how browsers handle this specific use case. However, it may also introduce unnecessary overhead or complexities due to the extra argument. * **Not passing any arguments (only `concat()`)**: This approach is likely to be more efficient and straightforward, as it doesn't require passing any additional data. **Library Used** None of the test cases appear to rely on external libraries. However, if we look at the benchmark definition scripts, we can see that they're using standard JavaScript features like `let` declarations, array literals, and the `concat()` method. **Special JS Feature or Syntax (if applicable)** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. They only rely on basic JavaScript constructs. **Other Alternatives** If you were to create a similar benchmark, here are some alternative approaches you could consider: * Compare using different data structures instead of arrays (e.g., objects, sets). * Test with different browsers or versions. * Explore the impact of other factors, such as array length or element count, on the performance of the concatenation operation. By analyzing these test cases and considering alternative approaches, developers can gain insights into how JavaScript engines handle specific use cases and identify areas for optimization or improvement.
Related benchmarks:
array_concat_sprad
push.apply vs concat
Lodash _concat vs native concat
shift, unshift, concat
flat vs concat test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?