Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
my test lodash vs native
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs es6
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
lodash
var array = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'] /* Lodash */ var result = _.indexOf(array, 'd') > -1
es6
var array = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'] /* ES6 */ var result = array.indexOf('d') > -1
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
es6
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: 1. Using the Lodash library (a popular JavaScript utility library) to find the index of a value in an array. 2. Using the native JavaScript `indexOf` method (introduced in ECMAScript 6, ES6) to achieve the same result. **Test Case 1: Lodash** The test case uses the Lodash library, which provides a variety of useful functions for working with arrays, objects, and more. In this case, it's being used to find the index of the value `'d'` in an array using the `_.indexOf` method. **Pros of using Lodash:** * Convenience: Lodash provides a simple and easy-to-use API for finding indices and performing other common array operations. * Utility functions: Lodash includes many useful utility functions that can be used beyond just indexing arrays, such as `map`, `filter`, and more. **Cons of using Lodash:** * Performance overhead: Using a library like Lodash may introduce additional latency due to the need to load and initialize the library, even if it's not actually being used. * Dependency on external resources: The test case relies on the presence of the Lodash library being loaded from an external source (in this case, `https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js`). **Test Case 2: ES6** The second test case uses the native JavaScript `indexOf` method, which was introduced in ECMAScript 6 (ES6). This method is designed to be more efficient and concise than using a library like Lodash. **Pros of using native JavaScript `indexOf`:** * Performance benefits: Using the native `indexOf` method should be faster and more efficient than relying on a library. * Reduced overhead: Without the need to load an external library, this approach reduces the overall latency and complexity of the test case. **Cons of using native JavaScript `indexOf`:** * Limited functionality: The `indexOf` method only provides basic indexing functionality and does not offer many other utility functions like Lodash. **Library Used: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of useful functions for working with arrays, objects, and more. It's widely used in the industry and can be included in projects to provide additional functionality without requiring manual implementation. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None mentioned** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing performance between two different approaches. **Alternative Approaches:** * Other methods for finding indices in arrays, such as using `for` loops or other array iteration techniques. * Alternative libraries that offer similar functionality to Lodash, but with different APIs and implementations. * Optimizations and techniques for improving the performance of native JavaScript `indexOf`, such as caching or memoization. In summary, this benchmark compares the performance of using a library like Lodash versus the native JavaScript `indexOf` method. The pros and cons of each approach highlight the trade-offs between convenience, performance, and overhead when choosing a method to find indices in arrays.
Related benchmarks:
Comparing performance of native .length and Lodash _.isEmpty
trim loadsh vs native trim
isEmpty vs. vanilla
lodash isFunction vs native
Lodash.js vs Native - empty
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?