Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
xml vs json
(version: 0)
Benchmark.js
Comparing performance of:
XML vs JSON
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
XML
const html = "<html><body><div>test</div></body></html>" const parser = new DOMParser(); const virtualDom = parser.parseFromString(html, 'text/html'); const body = virtualDom.querySelector('body');
JSON
const html = ` { "type": "element", "name": "html", "children": [ { "type": "element", "name": "body", "children": [ { "type": "element", "name": "div", "children": [ { "type": "text", "value": "test" } ] } ] } ] } `; const parsed = JSON.parse(html); const body = parsed.children[0]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
XML
JSON
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:149.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/149.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 149 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=627026" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
JSON
1.5M/s
XML
143K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
JSON
1,541,319 Ops/sec
XML
143,095 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmarking test cases. **What is being tested?** The two test cases compare the performance of parsing and rendering HTML documents using JavaScript. Specifically, they are comparing: 1. **DOMParser**: A built-in JavaScript API for parsing XML documents into a Document Object Model (DOM). 2. **JSON.parse()**: A built-in JavaScript function for parsing JSON data into a JavaScript object. **Options compared:** The test cases compare the performance of two approaches: A) Using `DOMParser` to parse an HTML string and render it as a DOM. B) Parsing the same HTML string using `JSON.parse()` (although technically, this is not JSON, but rather an HTML document). **Pros and cons of each approach:** 1. **DOMParser**: * Pros: + Native support in most browsers + Efficient for large documents * Cons: + Can be slow for small or simple documents (due to the overhead of creating a DOM) 2. **JSON.parse()**: * Pros: + Lightweight and fast for small or simple documents + Can be used in environments where DOM is not supported * Cons: + Not native support in all browsers (although it's widely implemented) + May require additional processing to render the HTML **Library:** In this case, there isn't a specific library being compared. However, both `DOMParser` and `JSON.parse()` rely on internal browser APIs or implementations that are considered standard. **Special JavaScript feature or syntax:** There is no special feature or syntax being tested in these benchmarks. They focus solely on the performance comparison between two parsing approaches. **Other alternatives:** For parsing HTML documents, other alternatives might include: 1. **Cheerio**: A lightweight, fast JavaScript library for parsing and manipulating HTML documents. 2. **JQuery.parseHTML()**: A method within jQuery that parses HTML strings into a DOM. 3. **XPath expressions**: An XPath expression can be used to query the structure of an HTML document. However, these alternatives are not being tested in this specific benchmark.
Related benchmarks
Lodash cloneDeep vs structuredClone vs JSON Parse (deep object)
Lodash cloneDeep vs structuredClone vs JSON-JSON
JSON.stringify vs structuredClone (7 KB JSON)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?