Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test1sadasd
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
reg vs slice
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var aaaa = 'xcvbnm,.sdfghjklertyuiopdfghjklcvbnm,.fghjk'
Tests:
reg
const reg = `(\\S{${5}})(\\S*)(\\S{${5})`; return aaaa?.replace(RegExp(reg), `$1${'...'}$3`) ?? '';
slice
return `${aaaa.slice(0, 5)}...${aaaa.slice(-5)}`;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
reg
slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON. **Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of two different JavaScript functions: `slice` and regular expression (regex) substitution (`reg`). The goal is to determine which function is faster on a specific platform. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code for both tests includes a string variable `aaaa`, which is assigned a large, random string. This suggests that the benchmark is testing the performance of these functions when dealing with large data. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **`reg`**: This function uses a regex pattern to substitute a specific substring within the `aaaa` string. The pattern is: * `\S{5}`: Matches any non-whitespace character (letters, numbers, etc.) exactly 5 times. * `(\\S*)`: Captures any non-whitespace characters as group 1. * `(\\\\S{${5})`: Matches the same regex pattern again. The function uses the `replace()` method with a RegExp object, and returns an empty string if no match is found. The `RawUAString` field in the benchmark result shows that Chrome 102 on Mac OS X 10.15.7 is used to execute this test. **Pros and Cons of Approaches** Both approaches have their pros and cons: * **`reg`**: Pros: + May be more efficient for regex substitution, as it avoids the overhead of string manipulation. + Can handle complex patterns with capturing groups. * Cons: + The use of `RegExp` can introduce additional overhead due to compilation and parsing. + The pattern itself may require more computational resources due to its complexity. * **`slice`**: Pros: + Typically faster for simple substring extraction, as it avoids the overhead of regex compilation. + More intuitive syntax for developers familiar with string manipulation. * Cons: + May not be suitable for complex patterns or large strings, where regex substitution might be more efficient. **Library and Syntax Considerations** The `slice()` function is a built-in JavaScript method, which means it's part of the standard library. It's widely supported across most browsers and platforms. There are no notable special JS features or syntax used in these benchmarks. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives to measure similar performance characteristics, consider: * Using a different regex engine (e.g., PCRE) instead of the JavaScript built-in one. * Comparing the performance of other string manipulation methods, such as `substring()`, `indexOf()`, or `indexOf()` with capturing groups. * Using benchmarking libraries like Benchmark.js, which provides more advanced features for comparing performance.
Related benchmarks:
Map vs Object test with unicode
Yeahaaa
Rafa speed test 1
Encode byte string test (string concatenation vs. map join)
fjdfjdu34uerh
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?