Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
bignumber.js vs. big.js vs. decimal.js performance instance3
(version: 0)
- https://github.com/MikeMcl/bignumber.js/tree/v9.0.0 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/big.js/tree/v5.2.2 - https://github.com/MikeMcl/decimal.js/tree/v10.2.0
Comparing performance of:
decimal.js vs big.js vs bignumber.js vs Raw number
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iriscouch/bigdecimal.js/v0.6.1/lib/bigdecimal.js"></script--> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bignumber.js/9.0.1/bignumber.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/big.js/6.0.3/big.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/decimal.js/10.2.1/decimal.min.js"></script> <!--script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/infusion/Fraction.js/v4.0.12/fraction.min.js"></script-->
Tests:
decimal.js
var a = new Decimal("0.0000000000000001");
big.js
var a = new Big("0.0000000000000001");
bignumber.js
var a = new BigNumber("0.0000000000000001");
Raw number
var a = parseFloat('0.0000000000000001');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
decimal.js
big.js
bignumber.js
Raw number
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three libraries: `bignumber.js`, `big.js`, and `decimal.js`. Each library is used to create instances with very small decimal numbers (0.0000000000000001), and their execution performance is measured in executions per second. **Libraries and Their Purpose** * **Bignumber.js**: A JavaScript library for large numerical computations, specifically designed to handle very large numbers that cannot be represented by regular JavaScript numbers. * **Big.js**: Another library for working with large integers and decimals, which provides a more mathematical approach compared to `bignumber.js`. * **Decimal.js**: A library for precise arithmetic operations on decimal numbers. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of three options: 1. **Raw Number**: Using the built-in JavaScript `parseFloat` function to convert a string to a number. 2. **Bignumber.js**: Creating an instance of the `bignumber.js` library with a small decimal number. 3. **Big.js** and **Decimal.js**: Creating instances of their respective libraries with the same small decimal number. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each option: * **Raw Number**: + Pros: Simple, lightweight, and widely supported. + Cons: May not provide precise arithmetic operations, and can lead to rounding errors. * **Bignumber.js**: + Pros: Optimized for large numerical computations, provides precise results, and supports various arithmetic operations. + Cons: Can be heavier than other options due to its specialized library. * **Big.js** and **Decimal.js**: + Both provide precise arithmetic operations and support for large numbers. + **Big.js**: May be more mathematical in approach, which can be beneficial for certain use cases. However, it may have a steeper learning curve compared to `bignumber.js` and `decimal.js`. + **Decimal.js**: Specifically designed for decimal arithmetic, providing high precision and support for various decimal operations. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these options, consider the specific requirements of your project: * If you need precise arithmetic operations with large numbers, and are willing to invest in learning more about `Big.js` or `Decimal.js`, they might be a better choice. * For general-purpose numerical computations, `bignumber.js` is likely a good all-around option due to its optimized performance and ease of use. * If you prioritize simplicity and lightweightness, using the built-in JavaScript `parseFloat` function might be sufficient for many use cases. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to consider: * **Fraction.js**: A library specifically designed for working with rational numbers (fractions) in JavaScript. * **Quantum.js**: Another library providing high-performance arithmetic operations for large numbers, including quantum-inspired algorithms. Please note that this is not an exhaustive list of options, and you may need to explore other libraries depending on your specific requirements.
Related benchmarks:
bignumber.js vs. big.js vs. decimal.js performance
bignumber.js vs. big.js vs. decimal.js performance instance
bignumber.js vs. big.js vs. decimal.js performance instance4
bignumber.js vs. big.js vs break_infinity.js
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?