Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JSON stringify long array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON Stringify 1 vs JSON Stringify 2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var longArray = [...Array(1000).keys()];
Tests:
JSON Stringify 1
JSON.stringify(longArray)
JSON Stringify 2
JSON.stringify(longArray);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON Stringify 1
JSON Stringify 2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition represents a simple JavaScript function that creates an array of numbers from 0 to 999 using the `Array` constructor and then stringifies it into JSON format. This is done twice, once with parentheses (JSON.stringify(longArray)) and once without (JSON.stringify(longArray;)). **Options being compared** There are two main options being compared: 1. **JSON.stringify() with parentheses**: This option uses a semicolon at the end of the string literal to separate it from the function call. 2. **JSON.stringify() without parentheses**: This option does not use a semicolon after the string literal. **Pros and Cons** **Option 1: JSON.stringify() with parentheses** Pros: * This is the conventional way of calling `JSON.stringify()` in JavaScript, as specified by the ECMAScript standard. * It's likely to be optimized by modern browsers for better performance. Cons: * Some older browsers might not support this syntax or might have quirks with it. **Option 2: JSON.stringify() without parentheses** Pros: * This syntax is more explicit and might help prevent common errors, such as accidentally omitting the semicolon. * Some browsers might optimize this syntax differently, potentially leading to better performance in certain cases. Cons: * This syntax is less conventional and might not be optimized by modern browsers. * It can lead to slightly slower execution times due to additional parsing overhead. **Library usage** There doesn't appear to be any external libraries being used in the benchmark. The `JSON.stringify()` function is a built-in JavaScript method. **Special JS features or syntax** None of the options being compared rely on special JavaScript features or syntax that would be non-standard or browser-specific. The focus is solely on the `JSON.stringify()` function and its syntax variants. **Other alternatives** There are other ways to create JSON strings, such as using a library like Lodash's `toJSON()` method or implementing your own serialization logic. However, for this specific benchmark, it seems that the built-in `JSON.stringify()` function is being tested in its most basic form. The provided benchmark results show that both options perform similarly in Firefox 101 on a Mac OS X 10.15 desktop environment. The actual execution times are very close, with Option 1 executing about 2-3% faster than Option 2.
Related benchmarks:
JSON stringify long array with ids
JSON.parse vs string.split 10 000 000 elements
Lodash vs json-stable-stringify (Stringify) "a" === "b"
Lodash vs json-stable-stringify (Stringify) object vs object
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?