Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread Operator vs Deepmerge (v06112022)
(version: 0)
Answering https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58702513/lodash-clone-array-vs-spread-operator#
Comparing performance of:
Spread Operator vs deepmerge
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://unpkg.com/deepmerge@4.2.2/dist/umd.js'></script> <script src='https://unpkg.com/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var a = {a: 1, b: 2, c: {d: 'e', e: 'f'}}; var b = {f: {d: 'e', e: 'f'}, g: 1000, h: 'i'};
Tests:
Spread Operator
const res1 = {...a, ...b};
deepmerge
const res2 = deepmerge(a, b)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread Operator
deepmerge
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
11 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/138.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 138 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Spread Operator
19584854.0 Ops/sec
deepmerge
1089847.1 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to merge two objects: the spread operator (`...`) and `deepmerge` library. **Spread Operator vs Deepmerge (v06112022)** The benchmark is based on a question from Stack Overflow (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58702513/lodash-clone-array-vs-spread-operator#) that discusses the performance of using the spread operator (`...`) versus the `deepmerge` library to merge two objects. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This approach uses the spread operator to create a new object by copying properties from both input objects. 2. **Deepmerge**: This is a library that provides a more efficient and flexible way to merge objects, which can be useful in various scenarios. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Spread Operator (`...`)** Pros: * Simple and intuitive syntax * Fast execution (native JavaScript operation) Cons: * Can lead to slower performance for large datasets due to the overhead of creating a new object * May not work as expected with nested objects or arrays that have complex structures **Deepmerge** Pros: * Optimized for performance, especially when dealing with large datasets * Handles nested objects and arrays more robustly than the spread operator Cons: * More verbose syntax compared to the spread operator * Requires an additional library dependency (`deepmerge`) **Library: Deepmerge** Deepmerge is a JavaScript library that provides a simple and efficient way to merge objects. It's designed to handle complex object structures, including nested objects and arrays. The library uses a proprietary algorithm to optimize performance. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None mentioned in the benchmark definition. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the specific requirements of your use case: * If you need a simple, lightweight solution for small datasets, the spread operator might be sufficient. * For larger datasets or more complex object structures, `deepmerge` is likely a better choice due to its optimized performance and robust handling of nested objects. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for merging objects include: 1. **Lodash's `cloneDeep()`**: Similar to `deepmerge`, but part of the Lodash library. 2. **JSON Merge Patch**: A lightweight library that provides a simple way to merge JSON objects. 3. **Object.assign()**: A built-in JavaScript method that can be used for object merging, although it may not handle nested objects or arrays as robustly as `deepmerge`. Keep in mind that each alternative has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements and constraints.
Related benchmarks:
lodash merge vs deepmerge.all
lodash merge vs deepmerge latest
Lodash clone VS Lodash cloneDeep VS Spread operator with array of objects
lodash merge vs deepmerge vs Object.assign
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?