Benchmark: Lodash "uniqWith" "uniqBy" "unionWith" "unionBy"

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'name': 'barney',  'age': 36 },
  { 'name': 'pebbles', 'age': 5 }
];

var newUsers = [
  { 'name': 'fred',    'age': 40 },
  { 'name': 'barney',  'age': 36 },
  { 'name': 'pebbles', 'age': 2 }
];

for(let i = 0; i < 2000; i++) {
  var newUser = { 'name': 'user_' + i, 'age': Math.floor(Math.random() * i) };
  newUsers.push(newUser);
}

Tests:

uniqWith
const unionUsers1 = _.uniqWith(newUsers.concat(users), _.isEqual);
uniqBy
const unionUsers2 = _.uniqBy(newUsers.concat(users), 'name');
UnionWith
const unionUsers3 = _.unionWith(newUsers, users, _.isEqual);
unionBy
const unionUsers4 = _.unionBy(newUsers, users, 'name');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
uniqWith
uniqBy
UnionWith
unionBy

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Lodash "uniqWith" "uniqBy" "unionWith" "unionBy" (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: uniqWith vs uniqBy vs UnionWith vs unionBy

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

uniqWith

uniqBy

UnionWith

unionBy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results