Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test for loop 22
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
test 1 vs test 2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
test 1
let ddd = [ { _id: 'Completed', count: 5, color: '#60C121', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'No Action', count: 3, color: '#EB3434', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Ongoing', count: 6, color: '#10B1B1', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Pending', count: 1, color: '#7084F3', percentage: 0, }, ]; let da = [ { _id: 'Completed', count: 0, color: '#60C121', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'No Action', count: 0, color: '#EB3434', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Ongoing', count: 0, color: '#10B1B1', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Pending', count: 0, color: '#7084F3', percentage: 0, }, ]; const aa = () => { ddd.forEach(element => { let index = da.findIndex(val => element._id === val._id); da[index] = element; }); }; aa()
test 2
let ddd = [ { _id: 'Completed', count: 5, color: '#60C121', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'No Action', count: 3, color: '#EB3434', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Ongoing', count: 6, color: '#10B1B1', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Pending', count: 1, color: '#7084F3', percentage: 0, }, ]; let da = [ { _id: 'Completed', count: 0, color: '#60C121', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'No Action', count: 0, color: '#EB3434', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Ongoing', count: 0, color: '#10B1B1', percentage: 0, }, { _id: 'Pending', count: 0, color: '#7084F3', percentage: 0, }, ]; const bb = () => { ddd.forEach(element => { let index = null; for (let i = 0; i < da.length; i++) { if (da[i]._id === element._id) { index = i; break; } } if (index !== null) da[index] = element; }); }; bb()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test 1
test 2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains metadata about the test case, such as its name, description, script preparation code, and HTML preparation code. In this case, there is no description or preparation code, which suggests that the test case is intentionally simplified. **Individual Test Cases:** There are two test cases: 1. **Test Case 1:** The benchmark definition contains a JavaScript array `ddd` with four elements, each representing a task with an `_id`, `count`, `color`, and `percentage`. The test case uses the `findIndex()` method to find the index of the matching element in another array `da`. The test case creates a function `aa()` that iterates through `ddd` and updates the corresponding elements in `da`. 2. **Test Case 2:** The benchmark definition is identical to Test Case 1, but with a different function name `bb()`. This function uses a traditional `for` loop to find the index of the matching element in `da`. **Comparison:** Both test cases are comparing the performance of using `findIndex()` versus a traditional `for` loop to update elements in an array. The test case is likely measuring which approach is faster and more efficient. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **`findIndex()` method:** * Pros: + Efficient use of modern JavaScript features. + Can be faster for large datasets due to its optimized implementation. * Cons: + May have a higher overhead for small datasets or specific edge cases. 2. **Traditional `for` loop:** * Pros: + Can be more predictable and easier to understand for developers familiar with traditional loops. + Often has lower overhead for small datasets or simple iterations. * Cons: + May be slower for large datasets due to its iterative nature. **Library and Features:** Neither test case explicitly uses a library, but the `findIndex()` method is a built-in JavaScript function. There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in either benchmark definition. **Alternative Approaches:** Other alternatives for updating elements in an array could include: 1. Using `forEach()` with an index variable. 2. Utilizing `map()` to create a new array with updated elements. 3. Leveraging `splice()` to modify the original array. These alternative approaches may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
for loop vs every
Compare prototype.reverse to for-loop
var vs let vs const loopy
cycle speed
endsWith() vs Ordinary For loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?