Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JSON stringily
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON stringify empty object vs Just empty string assignment
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
JSON stringify empty object
const test = JSON.stringify({})
Just empty string assignment
const test = '{}';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON stringify empty object
Just empty string assignment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by a JSON string, which represents a JavaScript expression or code snippet that is being measured for performance. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. `const test = JSON.stringify({})`: This code creates an empty object using the `{}` syntax and then passes it to the `JSON.stringify()` function. 2. `const test = '{}';`: This code simply assigns an empty string to a variable named `test`. **Options Compared** These two benchmark definitions compare the performance of: * Using the `{}` syntax to create an object (benchmark 1) * Using a string literal (`''`) to represent an empty value (benchmark 2) **Pros and Cons** * Using the `{}` syntax: + Pros: It is a more idiomatic way to create an empty object in JavaScript. It also allows for creating objects with additional properties. + Cons: It might lead to performance differences due to the way JavaScript engines handle object creation and parsing. * Using a string literal (`''`): + Pros: It is a simple and concise way to represent an empty value, which can be faster in terms of execution time. + Cons: It does not provide any information about the contents or structure of the data. **Library** There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, `JSON.stringify()` is a built-in JavaScript function that uses the ECMAScript 5 (ES5) specification to serialize JavaScript objects into a JSON string. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** Neither of the benchmark definitions uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. They are simple and straightforward expressions that can be executed by most modern JavaScript engines. **Other Considerations** * The `JSON.stringify()` function is an expensive operation, especially for large objects. This might lead to performance differences between the two benchmarks. * Some JavaScript engines might optimize the `{}` syntax creation process more than the string literal approach. * The test cases only measure the execution time of these simple expressions, which might not accurately represent real-world scenarios where JSON serialization is used. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for testing JSON-related benchmark could include: * Creating larger objects and measuring the time it takes to serialize them * Comparing different JSON parsing libraries or implementations (e.g., jQuery's `json()` function) * Testing the performance of various data formats, such as CSV or XML By exploring these alternative test cases, you can gain a better understanding of how JavaScript engines handle complex JSON-related scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
ITFB. Reinventing JSON parser
3554646456547457344573454563453454656
json stringify vs string...
test json vs omit
JSON.stringify vs structuredClone (7 KB JSON)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?