Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash Uniq vs Javascript Set
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash Uniq vs Javascript Set
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var firstEqual = []; var secondEqual = []; for (var i=0; i<=10000000; i++) { firstEqual.push(i); secondEqual.push(i); } var arrayToDedup = [...firstEqual, ...secondEqual];
Tests:
Lodash Uniq
_.uniq(arrayToDedup);
Javascript Set
[...new Set(arrayToDedup)]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash Uniq
Javascript Set
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to remove duplicate elements from an array: using the `lodash uniq` function and creating a new Set object. **Options Compared** 1. **Lodash Uniq**: This method uses the `_.uniq` function from the Lodash library, which is a utility library for functional programming in JavaScript. 2. **JavaScript Set**: This approach uses the built-in `Set` data structure in JavaScript to remove duplicates. A Set is an unordered collection of unique values. **Pros and Cons** **Lodash Uniq** Pros: * Fast execution time due to optimized implementation * Handles edge cases like NaN or null values * Provides a consistent and predictable output Cons: * Requires including the Lodash library, which adds extra overhead * May not be suitable for small datasets due to its performance optimization * Not as efficient as the JavaScript Set approach for very large datasets **JavaScript Set** Pros: * Fast execution time, especially for large datasets * Does not require any additional libraries or dependencies * Scalable and efficient Cons: * Can be slower than Lodash Uniq for small datasets due to overhead of creating a Set object * May return incorrect results if the array contains non-numeric values (NaN or null) **Library and Purpose** The `lodash uniq` function is a utility function that removes duplicate elements from an array. It returns a new array with unique elements, preserving the original order. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None mentioned in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** * The use of `var` instead of `let` or `const` for variable declarations may lead to issues with hoisting and scope. * The use of `push` to add elements to an array is not the most efficient approach. Using `splice` or `unshift` might be faster, but it's not shown in this benchmark. **Alternatives** Other approaches to remove duplicates from an array include: 1. **Splice**: Use `splice` method to remove duplicate elements by index. 2. **Slice and Filter**: Create a new array using `slice` and filter out duplicates using `filter`. 3. **Array Comprehension**: Use arrow functions and the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array with unique elements. It's worth noting that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash Uniq vs Javascript [...new Set()]
Lodash Uniq vs Javascript Set Iterator vs Javascript Set Array.from
lodash uniq vs set - 3
lodash uniq vs Array.from(new Set()) vs spread new Set() vs for vs for memory optimized 4
lodash uniq vs spread new Set() medium size
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?