Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Compare detecting object keys starting with "on"
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
RegEx vs Substr vs charAt vs Array access
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function noop(){}; const attrs = { id: 'test', onclick: noop, class: 'test' }; function getAttrs() { return attrs; } function getElem() { return document.createElement('div'); }
Tests:
RegEx
const el = getElem(); const attrs = getAttrs(); const re = /^on/; Object.keys(attrs).forEach( attr => { if( re.test( attr ) ) { el[ attr ] = attrs[ attr ]; } else { el.setAttribute( attr, attrs[ attr ] ); } });
Substr
const el = getElem(); const attrs = getAttrs(); Object.keys(attrs).forEach( attr => { if( attr.substr( 0, 2 ) === 'on' ) { el[ attr ] = attrs[ attr ]; } else { el.setAttribute( attr, attrs[ attr ] ); } });
charAt
const el = getElem(); const attrs = getAttrs(); Object.keys(attrs).forEach( attr => { if( attr.charAt( 0 ) === 'o' && attr.charAt( 1 ) === 'n' ) { el[ attr ] = attrs[ attr ]; } else { el.setAttribute( attr, attrs[ attr ] ); } });
Array access
const el = getElem(); const attrs = getAttrs(); Object.keys(attrs).forEach( attr => { if( attr[ 0 ] === 'o' && attr[ 1 ] === 'n' ) { el[ attr ] = attrs[ attr ]; } else { el.setAttribute( attr, attrs[ attr ] ); } });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
RegEx
Substr
charAt
Array access
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided benchmark, hosted on MeasureThat.net, aims to compare the performance of three different approaches for detecting object keys in an object that start with the string "on". The benchmark consists of four test cases: 1. Using regular expressions (RegEx) 2. Using the `substr` method 3. Using the `charAt` method 4. Using array access **Library:** None of the provided code uses a specific JavaScript library, but it does use the built-in `Object.keys()` and `Array.prototype.forEach()` methods. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** None of the test cases explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is required for the comparison. **Approaches Compared:** The benchmark compares four approaches to detect object keys that start with "on": 1. **RegEx**: This approach uses a regular expression (`^on/`) to match keys that start with "on". 2. **Substr**: This approach uses the `substr` method to extract the first two characters of each key. 3. **charAt**: This approach uses the `charAt` method to access the first character of each key. 4. **Array access**: This approach uses array access (`attr[0] === 'o' && attr[1] === 'n'`) to compare the first two characters of each key. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **RegEx**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, as regular expressions are optimized for performance. * Cons: May be slower than other approaches if not properly optimized, and can be less readable due to its complexity. 2. **Substr**: * Pros: Simple and easy to read, as it uses a well-known method for substring extraction. * Cons: May be slower than RegEx due to the overhead of string slicing. 3. **charAt**: * Pros: Simple and easy to read, as it uses a well-known method for character access. * Cons: May be slower than RegEx or Substr due to the overhead of accessing individual characters. 4. **Array access**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, as array access is optimized for performance. * Cons: Less readable due to its use of implicit comparison. **Other Considerations:** When choosing an approach, consider the trade-off between performance and readability. RegEx might be the fastest but also the most complex, while array access might be the most readable but slightly slower. In general, if you need a balance between speed and readability, `charAt` or `substr` might be good choices. If performance is critical and readability can be sacrificed, RegEx might be the best option.
Related benchmarks:
Has Class Function
using getAttribute vs property to access an element's id
Compare createElement vs template String
Parse attributes of DOM element
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?