Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Timestamp
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
object vs + unary
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
object
(new Date()).getTime();
+ unary
+new Date();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
object
+ unary
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 141 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=619850" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
object
12.0M/s
+ unary
6.3M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
object
12,024,385 Ops/sec
+ unary
6,313,068 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and its results, making it easier to understand for software engineers of all levels. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a simple JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark measures the performance of two different ways to get the current timestamp in JavaScript: using the `new Date()` method or adding parentheses around the expression `(new Date()).getTime();`. **Script Preparation Code and Html Preparation Code** In this specific benchmark, neither the script preparation code nor the HTML preparation code is provided. This means that the benchmarking framework automatically generates these codes to ensure consistent test environments. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **"object"`: This test case uses the `new Date()` method without parentheses. ```javascript (new Date()).getTime(); ``` 2. **"+ unary"`**: This test case adds parentheses around the expression `(new Date()).getTime();`. ```javascript +(new Date()).getTime(); ``` **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** The main difference between these two approaches is that they affect the operator precedence. * `new Date()` uses the `new` keyword, which has a higher precedence than parentheses. This means that without parentheses, JavaScript will evaluate `new Date()` as `(new) Date()`, treating `Date` as a function and attempting to call it immediately. * Adding parentheses around the expression, like in the second test case (`+(new Date()).getTime();`), changes the operator precedence. The parentheses ensure that the expression is evaluated without calling the `Date` constructor prematurely. **Pros of using parentheses:** * Ensures correct behavior according to JavaScript's grammar rules. * Prevents potential errors due to incorrect usage of the `new` keyword. **Cons of using parentheses:** * May affect performance, as adding parentheses can increase the number of operations required to evaluate the expression. * Can lead to slightly slower execution times compared to not using parentheses. **Library and Purpose (if applicable)** None of the provided test cases rely on any external libraries. The `Date` object is a built-in JavaScript type. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The test cases use the following special syntax: * The `new` keyword in the first test case. * The addition operator (`+`) with parentheses in the second test case. These features are standard JavaScript syntax and do not require any additional libraries or configurations to be evaluated. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to create a similar benchmark, you could consider using other methods to get the current timestamp in JavaScript, such as: * Using `Date.now()`: This method returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970). * Using `performance.now()`: This method returns the time elapsed since the page was loaded or the start of the current timing context. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and may not be equivalent to using the `Date` object.
Related benchmarks
Date time performance
Date vs Moment get timestamp
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?