Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
_.range(N) vs [...Array(N).keys()]
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var size = 1000;
Tests:
Lodash
_.range(size);
Spread operator
[...Array(size).keys()]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's happening in this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The website, MeasureThat.net, runs JavaScript microbenchmarks to compare the performance of different approaches for creating arrays of fixed size. The two test cases measure: 1. Using Lodash's `_range` function to create an array of `size` elements. 2. Creating an array using the spread operator (`...`) with an array comprehension `[...Array(size).keys()]`. **Options being compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches. Pros and Cons of each approach: 1. **Lodash's `_range` function**: * Pros: Lodash is a well-maintained, widely-used library that provides various utility functions. Its `_range` function is likely optimized for performance. * Cons: It adds an additional dependency to the test case, which may not be desirable for some use cases. 2. **Spread operator (`...`) with array comprehension**: * Pros: This approach is concise and doesn't add any external dependencies. * Cons: The spread operator can create a new array object, which may incur additional overhead. **Library usage** The Lodash library is used in the first test case to provide its `_range` function. Lodash (short for "Lisp-like") is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks such as: + Array manipulation and iteration + String manipulation and formatting + Object creation and manipulation + Miscellaneous utilities **Special JS features or syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is used in the second test case to create an array. This is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). Other alternatives for creating arrays of fixed size include: 1. `Array.from()`: Introduced in ES6, this method creates a new array from an iterable source. 2. `new Array(size)`: Creates a new array object with the specified number of elements. 3. Manual loop-based approach: Creating an array by iterating over a loop and pushing elements to it. These alternatives may have different performance characteristics depending on the specific use case and JavaScript engine being used. In summary, the benchmark measures the performance of two approaches for creating arrays of fixed size: using Lodash's `_range` function versus the spread operator with an array comprehension. The pros and cons of each approach are considered, along with a brief explanation of the Lodash library and the modern spread operator syntax.
Related benchmarks:
_.range() vs Array.from() vs [...Array().keys()]
lodash range vs Array.from vs keys() + spread
lodash range vs Array.from + new Array vs keys() + spread
lodash range vs Array.from vs keys() + spread 234das
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?