Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash isUndefined vs isNil
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
isUndefined vs isNil
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
isUndefined
let a = [1, 2, 3]; let b = _.isUndefined(a[4]);
isNil
let a = [1, 2, 3]; let b = _.isNil(a[4]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
isUndefined
isNil
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
isUndefined
119262456.0 Ops/sec
isNil
119376064.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is tested?** The provided benchmark is testing two functions from the Lodash library: `_.isUndefined` and `_.isNil`. These functions are used to check if a value is undefined or null. **Options compared:** The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two functions in different scenarios. The options being compared are: 1. `_.isUndefined(a[4])` 2. `_.isNil(a[4])` These tests are checking how the Lodash library's functions perform when dealing with arrays and trying to access an index that doesn't exist. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** Both approaches have their pros and cons: 1. `_.isUndefined(a[4])`: * Pros: + This approach is more straightforward, as it directly checks if the value at the specified index is undefined. * Cons: + It requires the array to already be created with a defined length (i.e., no `push` operations after the fourth element). 2. `_.isNil(a[4])`: * Pros: + This approach is more concise and might be faster, as it avoids unnecessary checks. * Cons: + It can return false positives if the array has a different length or structure than expected. **Library:** The Lodash library is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like array manipulation, object merging, and more. In this benchmark, the `_.isUndefined` and `_.isNil` functions are used to check if a value is undefined or null, respectively. **Special JS feature/syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The tests only involve standard JavaScript variables and Lodash library functions. **Other alternatives:** If you didn't use the Lodash library for these specific functions, you could implement your own implementations using standard JavaScript: 1. `isUndefined(a[4])`: * Use a simple check like `if (a[4] === undefined)`. 2. `isNil(a[4])`: * Use a similar check like `if (a[4] === null)` or `if (!a[4] && typeof a[4] !== 'object')`. However, implementing your own functions for these specific tasks would likely be less efficient and might not cover all edge cases. **Benchmark preparation code:** The provided HTML preparation code includes the Lodash library script tag, which loads the `lodash.min.js` file. This ensures that the Lodash functions are available when running the benchmark test cases. The Script Preparation Code is empty, so no additional setup or initialization is required for this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
isFunction vs typeof function 6
lodash isFunction vs native
Null and undefined checks
isUndefined
lodash isNil vs native isNil with if
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?