Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
SPLICE vs SHIFT
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Splice vs loop shift
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Splice
const testArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]; testArray.splice(0, 19);
loop shift
const testArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]; for (let i = 0; i < 19; i++) testArray.shift();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Splice
loop shift
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The provided benchmark is testing two approaches to remove elements from an array in JavaScript: `splice` and `shift`. We'll break down what's being tested, compare the options, and discuss their pros and cons. **Tested Options:** 1. **`splice`**: The `splice` method modifies the original array by removing a specified number of elements at a given index (in this case, starting from the beginning). 2. **`loop shift`**: This approach uses a loop to repeatedly remove elements from the end of the array using the `shift()` method. **Pros and Cons:** * **`splice`**: + Pros: - Efficient in terms of memory usage, as it modifies the original array. - Can be faster for large arrays due to its optimized implementation. + Cons: - Creates a new array with the modified elements (if you don't specify an index), which can lead to increased memory allocation and garbage collection overhead. - May not be suitable for use cases where preserving the original array's structure is crucial. * **`loop shift`**: + Pros: - Preserves the original array's structure, as it only removes elements from the end without modifying the underlying array. - Can be useful when working with arrays that need to maintain a specific structure or order. + Cons: - Requires more memory allocation and garbage collection overhead due to creating new local variables and iterating over the array. - May be slower for large arrays due to the loop and method calls. **Library:** None of the tested options rely on any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript engines often have built-in optimizations and micro-optimizations for various array methods, which may affect the results in a benchmarking context. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** None mentioned. Now, let's consider alternative approaches to removing elements from an array: * **`filter()`**: Instead of `splice` or `shift`, you can use the `filter()` method to create a new array with only the desired elements. * **`slice()`**: Another approach is to use `slice()` to create a new array with a subset of the original array's elements. * **Native array methods in older browsers**: If you need to support older browsers, you might consider using native array methods like `splice()`, `shift()`, or `pop()` for compatibility. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the tested options. MeasureThat.net's benchmarking framework can help determine which approach is most efficient for a specific use case. In conclusion, the test case measures the performance difference between two common array manipulation techniques: `splice` and `loop shift`. The results provide valuable insights into the efficiency of each approach in different JavaScript engines and browsers.
Related benchmarks:
splice vs shift 3
Splice vs shift to remove at beginning of array (fixed from slice)
Splice vs Shift to remove from the beginning
Splice vs Shift perf
Empty array: Splice vs Shift
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?