Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Handsontable fastInnerText vs fastInnerHTML vs textContent
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
fastInnerHTML vs fastInnerText vs textContent
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="example"></div> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/handsontable-pro/dist/handsontable.full.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.element = document.getElementById('example');
Tests:
fastInnerHTML
return Handsontable.dom.fastInnerHTML(element, 'some text');
fastInnerText
return Handsontable.dom.fastInnerText(element, 'some text');
textContent
return element.textContent = 'some text';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
fastInnerHTML
fastInnerText
textContent
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** MeasureThat.net is testing three different approaches to set the text content of an HTML element: `fastInnerHTML`, `fastInnerText`, and `textContent`. The test compares the performance (in executions per second) of each approach on a Handsontable-pro DOM manipulation task. **Options Compared:** 1. `fastInnerHTML`: This method uses the `innerHTML` property to set the text content of an HTML element. 2. `fastInnerText`: This method uses the `innerText` property to set the text content of an HTML element. 3. `textContent`: This method sets the text content directly using the `textContent` property. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **fastInnerHTML**: * Pros: Can be more efficient for complex HTML structures, as it can parse and update the entire innerHTML at once. * Cons: May be slower than other methods for simple text updates due to its parsing overhead. 2. **fastInnerText**: * Pros: Typically faster than `innerHTML` for simple text updates, as it only sets the text content without parsing or updating surrounding elements. * Cons: Some browsers may have issues with `innerText`, especially when used in conjunction with certain HTML attributes or styles. 3. **textContent**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, as it directly sets the text content without parsing or updating surrounding elements. * Cons: May not work correctly in all cases, such as when using certain HTML attributes or styles that affect the element's formatting. **Handsontable Library:** The Handsontable library is a JavaScript framework for building spreadsheet-like tables. In this benchmark, it is used to create an example table and perform DOM manipulation tasks on it. **Other Considerations:** * The test uses Safari 15 as the primary browser, but MeasureThat.net also considers other factors such as device platform and operating system when reporting results. * The `ExecutionsPerSecond` value represents the number of times each method is executed per second, which can be used to gauge performance. **Special JS Features or Syntax:** None mentioned explicitly in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may have specific features or behaviors related to DOM manipulation, such as: * Safari's `innerText` handling issues * Firefox's `textContent` behavior with certain HTML attributes or styles **Alternatives:** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for setting text content, consider the following options: 1. **String concatenation**: Using `+` operators to concatenate strings and assign them directly to the element. 2. **DOM manipulation libraries**: Other libraries like jQuery or React might have optimized methods for setting text content. 3. **WebAssembly (WASM)**: For performance-critical applications, WASM can provide a sandboxed environment for executing low-level code. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as optimized as the specific implementations used by browsers and frameworks like Handsontable-pro.
Related benchmarks:
insertAdjacentHtml vs innerHTML (multiple)
appendChild vs. insertAdjacentHTML x1000
addEventListener() vs jQuery.on() with click
DOM Parser vs insertAdjacentHTML simple
insertAdjacentHtml vs createContextualFragment
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?