Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.sort vs Math.min+Math.max (with many array items)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.sort vs Math min and max
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = Array(10000).fill(Math.random())
Tests:
Array.sort
var a = arr.sort(); var min = a[0]; var max = a[a.length - 1];
Math min and max
var min = Math.min(...arr); var max = Math.max(...arr);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.sort
Math min and max
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two scripts: `Array.sort` and `Math min and max`. These scripts are designed to measure the performance of JavaScript arrays in different ways. **What's being tested?** 1. **Array.sort**: This script sorts an array of 10,000 random numbers using the built-in `sort()` method. 2. **Math min and max**: This script finds the minimum and maximum values in the same array using the `Math.min()` and `Math.max()` functions. **Options compared** The two scripts use different approaches to achieve similar goals: 1. **Array.sort**: Uses the `sort()` method, which sorts the array in-place and returns the sorted array. 2. **Math min and max**: Uses the `Math.min()` and `Math.max()` functions, which find the minimum and maximum values of an iterable (in this case, an array). **Pros and cons** 1. **Array.sort**: * Pros: In-place sorting, can be faster for large arrays due to caching. * Cons: Requires iterating over the entire array, can be slower for small arrays or specific use cases. 2. **Math min and max**: * Pros: Fast, efficient, and scalable, suitable for most use cases. * Cons: May not work well with custom sorting orders or complex data structures. **Library used** In this case, the `Array` library is being used implicitly, as it's part of the JavaScript standard library. The `sort()` method and other array methods are built-in functions that can be called on an Array object. **Special JS feature or syntax** There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two common algorithms: sorting an array using `Array.sort` versus finding minimum and maximum values using `Math.min()` and `Math.max()`. **Other alternatives** If you were to write a similar benchmark, you might also consider: 1. Using other sorting libraries or implementations (e.g., QuickSort, MergeSort). 2. Comparing the performance of different data structures for storing and querying arrays (e.g., linked lists, trees). 3. Evaluating the impact of various optimizations on array-based algorithms (e.g., caching, parallel processing). Keep in mind that measuring performance is an empirical science, and the results may vary depending on the specific use case, hardware, and software environment.
Related benchmarks:
Math.min vs Array.sort[0]
Custom sort vs typed array sort
Sort numbers with vs without arguments
Array.sort vs Math.min 1
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?