Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Js Canvas color pick 2
(version: 3)
Comparing performance of:
Pick color by getImageData() vs pick color by hsv
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<canvas id="colorPalette" width="228" height="228"></canvas>
Script Preparation code:
var colorPaletteCTX = document.getElementById('colorPalette').getContext('2d'); var boundry = document.getElementById('colorPalette').getBoundingClientRect(); if (colorPaletteCTX) { const { width, height } = colorPaletteCTX.canvas; colorPaletteCTX.clearRect(0, 0, width, height); const gradientH = colorPaletteCTX.createLinearGradient(0, 0, width, 0); gradientH.addColorStop(0, 'rgba(255,255,255,1)'); gradientH.addColorStop(1, 'rgba(255,0,0,1)'); colorPaletteCTX.fillStyle = gradientH; colorPaletteCTX.fillRect(0, 0, width, height); const gradientV = colorPaletteCTX.createLinearGradient(0, 0, 0, height); gradientV.addColorStop(0, 'rgba(0,0,0,0)'); gradientV.addColorStop(1, 'rgba(0,0,0,1)'); colorPaletteCTX.fillStyle = gradientV; colorPaletteCTX.fillRect(0, 0, width, height); } function clamp(value, min, max) { return Math.max(0, Math.min(1, value - min / max - min)); }; function rgb2Hex(red, green, blue) { let _r = red.toString(16); let _g = green.toString(16); let _b = blue.toString(16); // prepend 0s if necessary if (_r.length === 1) _r = '0' + _r; if (_g.length === 1) _g = '0' + _g; if (_b.length === 1) _b = '0' + _b; return `#${_r}${_g}${_b}`; }; function hsv2Rgb(hue, sat, val) { const f = (n, k = (n + hue / 60) % 6) => val - val * sat * Math.max(Math.min(k, 4 - k, 1), 0); return [ Math.round(f(5) * 255), Math.round(f(3) * 255), Math.round(f(1) * 255), ]; }; function hsv2Hex(hue, sat, val) { const [r, g, b] = hsv2Rgb(hue, sat, val); return rgb2Hex(r, g, b); }; function randomInteger(min, max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1)) + min; }
Tests:
Pick color by getImageData()
const x = randomInteger(0,227); const y = randomInteger(0,227); const pixel = colorPaletteCTX.getImageData(x, y, 1, 1)["data"]; console.log(rgb2Hex(pixel[0], pixel[1], pixel[2]));
pick color by hsv
const { top, left, width, height, } = boundry; const x = randomInteger(0,227); const y = randomInteger(0,227); console.log(hsv2Hex(0, clamp(Math.max(0, x - left) / width, 0, 1), clamp((height - Math.max(0, y - top)) / height, 0, 1)));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Pick color by getImageData()
pick color by hsv
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of two different approaches to picking colors from a canvas element: `getImageData()` and HSV (Hue, Saturation, Value) color spaces. The script preparation code sets up a canvas element with a gradient fill and calculates the bounds of the canvas. The HTML preparation code includes a canvas element with a specific width and height. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare the performance of: 1. `getImageData()` method to pick a pixel from the canvas. 2. HSV color space calculation to determine the dominant color of the gradient fill. **Pros and Cons** 1. **`getImageData()`**: This approach is simple and easy to implement, but it can be slower due to the following reasons: * It requires retrieving the pixel data from the canvas, which involves creating a new array of pixel values. * It requires iterating over the pixels to find the dominant color. 2. **HSV Color Space Calculation**: This approach is generally faster and more efficient than `getImageData()`, but it has some limitations: * It requires calculating the HSV values for each pixel, which can be computationally expensive. * It assumes that the gradient fill is linear, which might not always be the case. **Library and Syntax** The benchmark uses the following libraries and syntax: 1. `getBoundingClientRect()` method: This method returns a rectangular bounding box of an element on the screen. 2. `createLinearGradient()`: This method creates a linear gradient object that can be used to fill shapes. 3. `getImageData()`: This method retrieves pixel data from a canvas element. 4. `clamp()` function: This function limits a value to a specific range. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the benchmark code uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect its performance. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for picking colors from a canvas element include: 1. Using a color picker library like ColorPicker.js. 2. Implementing a custom color picker algorithm using machine learning techniques. 3. Using web workers to offload color calculation tasks from the main thread. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have their own trade-offs and performance characteristics, which would need to be evaluated separately.
Related benchmarks:
Canvas gradient perf
Canvas gradient perf
Canvas gradient perf
Canvas gradient perf
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?