Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Split vs join
(version: 0)
Many splits of a string vs many joins of an array
Comparing performance of:
split vs join
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = 'xs sm md lg xl' var arr = str.split(' ')
Tests:
split
var result = str.split(' ');
join
var result = arr.join(' ');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split
join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in this JavaScript benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: string splitting using the `split()` method and array joining using the `join()` method. **Options Being Compared** In the `Script Preparation Code`, we have a variable `str` initialized with a string containing multiple values separated by spaces. This string is then split into an array using either the `split()` method or left as is (implying no operation). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Splitting (`split()`)** * Pros: + Efficient for large strings, as it uses a regular expression to divide the string into substrings. + Can be used to create an array from a string with multiple values. * Cons: + May have overhead due to the use of regular expressions. + Can be slower than joining if only few elements are returned (due to the creation of intermediate arrays). 2. **Joining (`join()`)** * Pros: + Faster and more lightweight compared to splitting, as it doesn't require creating an array or using regular expressions. + Suitable for small datasets, as it can avoid overhead from array operations. * Cons: + Not suitable for large strings, as it would require processing each element individually. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark. However, the `split()` method does use a regular expression under the hood to divide the string into substrings. The `join()` method uses an array internally to store elements before joining them together. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax explicitly mentioned or utilized in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to compare different approaches for string manipulation, here are some alternatives: * Using `Array.prototype.map()`, `Array.prototype.forEach()`, or other iteration methods instead of `split()` and `join()`. * Comparing the performance of different string splitting methods (e.g., using `String.prototype.split()`, `Array.prototype.slice()`, or custom implementations). * Examining the impact of array size on performance when using either `split()` or `join()`. * Investigating the use of modern JavaScript features like template literals (`${}`) for string manipulation. Keep in mind that these alternatives would require significant changes to the benchmark setup and test cases.
Related benchmarks:
JSON.parse vs string.split small fixed array
String.split vs String.substring
IndexOf Array vs String
string concat + join vs unshift + join
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?