Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash join vs Object join
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs nativate
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.bootcdn.net/ajax/libs/layui/2.6.8/layui.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { arr[i] = i; } function fn(a) { return a * 2 * 5; }
Tests:
lodash
_.join(arr, '~');
nativate
arr.join('~')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
nativate
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a script that creates an array of 1000 numbers, then defines a function `fn` that takes a number as input and returns its product with 2 and 5. The script preparation code sets up this environment, while the HTML preparation code includes references to jQuery, Lodash, and Layui libraries. **Options being compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Lodash join**: This option uses the `_.join()` function from the Lodash library to concatenate the elements of the array with a separator character '~'. 2. **Native JavaScript join**: This option uses the built-in `join()` method of arrays in JavaScript, without any additional libraries. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Lodash join**: * Pros: Can handle non-string elements and provides more flexibility in terms of separator options. * Cons: Requires an external library (Lodash), which may add overhead to the benchmark. 2. **Native JavaScript join**: * Pros: No additional libraries are required, making it a lightweight option. * Cons: Only works with string elements, and performance may vary depending on the browser's implementation. In general, if you need more flexibility in your string concatenation operations or want to handle non-string elements, using Lodash join might be a better choice. However, if you're looking for a lightweight solution that only handles string concatenation, native JavaScript join is a viable option. **Other considerations** * The benchmark uses Chrome 101 as the test browser, which may not represent all possible browsers. * The benchmark runs on a Windows desktop platform, which may affect performance compared to other platforms (e.g., macOS or Linux). * Lodash library version 4.17.4 is used in this benchmark. **Library explanation** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks like string manipulation, array manipulation, and more. In this benchmark, the `_.join()` function is used to concatenate the elements of the array with a separator character '~'. In the provided JSON data, Lodash is included as an external library through the `Html Preparation Code`, which loads the necessary files before running the benchmark. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The script only uses standard JavaScript concepts like arrays, functions, and concatenation operators (`*` and `~`).
Related benchmarks:
lodash.each vs Object.forEach
Lodash vs for of
lodash.each vs Object.forEach vs jQuery each
_.join() vs Array.join()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?