Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array vs Set vs Object for removing value (1000 entries)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Set vs Array vs Object
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var master = Array(1000).fill(null).map((a, b) => b); var a = [...master]; var s = new Set(master); var o = []; master.forEach(x => { o[x] = x })
Tests:
Set
master.forEach(x => s.delete(x));
Array
master.forEach(x => a.splice(a.indexOf(x), 1));
Object
master.forEach(x => delete o[x]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Set
Array
Object
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three data structures: Arrays, Sets, and Objects. The test case uses a large array `master` with 1000 entries, all initialized to `null`. Three variables are created: * `a`: an Array copy of `master` * `s`: a Set instance containing all elements from `master` * `o`: an Object instance where each key is the corresponding value in `master` The test cases use a simple loop to remove each element from its respective data structure. **Options Compared** The three options compared are: 1. **Array**: Using the `splice()` method to remove elements from the array. 2. **Set**: Using the `delete` operator to remove elements from the set. 3. **Object**: Using the `delete` operator to remove properties from the object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Array**: + Pros: Arrays are designed for efficient insertion, deletion, and searching operations. + Cons: When removing an element, it shifts all subsequent elements down by one position, which can be slow for large arrays. * **Set**: + Pros: Sets are optimized for fast membership testing and removal of elements. + Cons: Not designed for sequential access or property lookup, which may lead to slower performance in this specific test case. * **Object**: + Pros: Objects provide fast lookups and property deletion. + Cons: When removing a property, it can be slow due to the need to update the object's internal hash table. **Library Usage** In this benchmark, none of the libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, Sets in JavaScript are implemented using an internally managed array-based data structure (the `Set` prototype). This means that when you create a new Set instance, it uses some underlying optimization and caching mechanisms to store and manage its elements efficiently. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the test cases utilize any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard ECMAScript. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative data structures for this type of benchmark, consider the following options: * **Linked Lists**: These can provide better performance for sequential access and insertion/deletion operations. * **Hash Tables**: Similar to Sets, but with additional features like cache-friendliness and fast lookups. Keep in mind that each data structure has its strengths and weaknesses, and choosing the right one depends on your specific use case. In summary, this benchmark tests the performance of removing elements from different data structures (Arrays, Sets, and Objects) by comparing their execution times. It provides a good starting point for evaluating the relative efficiency of these data structures in various scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
map vs forEach Chris
map vs forEach Chris v2
map vs forEach Chris v2b
Array.forEach vs Object.keys().forEach
Array from() vs Map.keys()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?