Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
blackList vs regexp
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
array search vs regexp
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var blackList = ["cazzo","madonna","stronzo","puttana","troia","porca","dio"] var regexp = /^(cazzo|madonna|stronzo|puttana|troia|porca|dio)$/
Tests:
array search
var result1 = blackList.indexOf("stronzo") >= -1; var result2 = blackList.indexOf("dio") >= -1; var result3 = blackList.indexOf("Marco") >= -1;
regexp
var result1 = "stronzo".match(regexp); var result2 = "dio".match(regexp); var result3 = "Marco".match(regexp);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array search
regexp
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two test cases: "array search" and "regexp". These test cases compare the performance of JavaScript arrays and regular expressions (regexps) in searching for specific values. **Options compared** In the "array search" test case, there are three operations: 1. `blackList.indexOf("stronzo") >= -1`: This operation checks if the string "stronzo" is present in the array `blackList`. If it is, the result will be a positive integer indicating the index of the element; otherwise, it will return `-1`. 2. `blackList.indexOf("dio") >= -1` 3. `blackList.indexOf("Marco") >= -1` These operations are likely executed sequentially to find all occurrences of "stronzo" and "dio" in the array. In the "regexp" test case, there are three operations: 1. `"stronzo".match(regexp)`: This operation checks if the string "stronzo" matches the regexp pattern defined in `regexp`. 2. `"dio".match(regexp)` 3. `"Marco".match(regexp)` These operations are also likely executed sequentially to find all occurrences of "stro-xyz" strings matching the regexp. **Pros and cons** Using arrays for search: * Pros: + Fast and efficient for small datasets. + Can be optimized for specific use cases (e.g., binary search). * Cons: + May not perform well for large datasets or dynamic data structures. + Can be slow if the dataset is not properly indexed. Using regexps: * Pros: + Highly flexible and powerful for pattern matching. + Can handle complex regular expressions with capture groups, anchors, and more. * Cons: + Generally slower than arrays for simple searches. + Can be computationally expensive due to the complexity of regexps. **Library usage** In this benchmark, `RegExp` is used as a library. The `RegExp` constructor is used to create the regexp pattern `regexp`. This library provides a way to define regular expression patterns and execute them against strings. **Special JS features or syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark that would require additional explanation beyond the regular expressions used. **Other alternatives** Some alternative approaches for searching data could include: 1. Using a `Set` data structure instead of an array, which provides faster lookup times. 2. Implementing a custom search algorithm tailored to specific use cases (e.g., binary search). 3. Using a database or external data storage solution for large datasets. However, these alternatives would likely require significant modifications to the benchmark and might not be as straightforward to compare with arrays and regexps using MeasureThat.net. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
regecxt
regecxgth
Regex First Name split vs match - no console
String.match vs. RegEx.test vs trim
includes + toLowerCase vs RegExp + i
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?