Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
var let test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
var vs let
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
var
var sum = 0; for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { for (var j = 0; j < 100; j++) { sum += j; if (sum > 10000) { sum = 0; } } };
let
let sum = 0; for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) { for (let j = 0; j < 100; j++) { sum += j; if (sum > 10000) { sum = 0; } } };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
var
let
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two variables in JavaScript: `var` and `let`. The test cases are simple loops that increment a variable (`sum`) within a nested loop structure. The goal is to measure which variable performs better in terms of execution speed. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`var`**: The traditional JavaScript keyword for declaring variables, introduced in ECMAScript 1999. 2. **`let`**: A newer keyword introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) to declare block-scoped variables. **Pros and Cons** ### `var` Pros: * Widespread support across browsers and older JavaScript versions * Simple to use and understand Cons: * `var` is function-scoped, which means it can "leak" into surrounding scopes, leading to unexpected behavior. * The variable's scope is determined by the nearest enclosing function or global scope, rather than being explicitly declared. ### `let` Pros: * Block-scoped, meaning its scope is limited to the block it's declared within (e.g., loops, if-else statements). * Avoids "leakage" into surrounding scopes. * Introduced in ES6, so it's a more modern and explicit way of declaring variables. Cons: * Requires support for ES6 syntax and modern browsers. * Can lead to confusion if not understood correctly. **Other Considerations** The benchmark also considers the use of `const`, which is another keyword introduced in ES6. However, since there are no test cases that explicitly use `const`, it's not considered in this comparison. **Library/Functionality Used** There doesn't seem to be any specific library or functionality used in this benchmark beyond the JavaScript variables being compared. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmark uses the following ES6 features: * Let and var declarations * Block-scoped variable declarations * For loops These features are supported by most modern browsers, including Chrome 100, which is used in the benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative JavaScript variables or scoping mechanisms, some alternatives include: * `const`: A keyword introduced in ES6 for declaring constant variables. * `let` and `const` with `var` (not recommended) * Arrow functions (`=>`) for creating concise functions * Classes and object-oriented programming for encapsulating data and behavior
Related benchmarks:
Var vs Let
var vs let
var vs. const vs. let
var vs let 111
let or without let
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?