Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array Find vs Some (shuffled array) 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
array find vs array some
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.core.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function shuffle(array) { let currentIndex = array.length, randomIndex; // While there remain elements to shuffle. while (currentIndex != 0) { // Pick a remaining element. randomIndex = Math.floor(Math.random() * currentIndex); currentIndex--; // And swap it with the current element. [array[currentIndex], array[randomIndex]] = [ array[randomIndex], array[currentIndex]]; } return array; } var data = shuffle('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.'.split(''));
Tests:
array find
data.find(item => item === 'x');
array some
data.some(item => item === 'x');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array find
array some
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to find an element in an array: 1. `Array.prototype.find()` 2. `Array.prototype.some()` The array contains a shuffled version of the string "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog." with each word as an individual element. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: * `Array.find()`: Returns the first element in the array that satisfies the provided condition. * `Array.some()`: Returns true if at least one element in the array satisfies the provided condition. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. `Array.prototype.find()`: * Pros: More efficient, as it only iterates over the array until it finds the desired element. * Cons: May not be suitable for large arrays or arrays with no matching elements (returns undefined in such cases). 2. `Array.prototype.some()`: * Pros: Suitable for larger arrays or when you want to check if at least one element matches the condition, without having to iterate over the entire array. * Cons: May not be as efficient as `find()` since it iterates over the entire array. **Library Used** The benchmark uses the Lodash library (`lodash.core.js`) for its `some()` function. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, and more. In this case, it's used to implement the `some()` method. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard in modern JavaScript. **Other Considerations** When writing benchmarks like this one, consider the following: * Use a representative dataset that covers various scenarios. * Avoid using complex logic or side effects in your test cases. * Keep the number of test cases manageable to avoid overwhelming the results. * Make sure to test with different devices and browsers to account for platform-specific differences. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for implementing `Array.prototype.find()` and `Array.prototype.some()` include: For `find()`: You can implement a custom function using a loop or recursion. For example: ```javascript function find(arr, callback) { for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { if (callback(arr[i])) return arr[i]; } return undefined; } ``` For `some()`: You can implement a custom function using a loop and a flag variable. For example: ```javascript function some(arr, callback) { let result = false; for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { if (callback(arr[i])) result = true; if (result) break; } return result; } ``` Keep in mind that these implementations may not be as efficient or readable as the standard `find()` and `some()` methods.
Related benchmarks:
Already sorted versus random
LIS-test2
set.has vs. array.includes vs obj[key] vs map.get 2
Array Find vs Some (shuffled array)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?