Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Split vs Regex (working)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Splitting vs Regex
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var testString = "testing\nNewlines\nBleh"
Tests:
Splitting
var values = testString.split("\n"); var value1 = values[0]; var value2 = values[1]; var value3 = values[2];
Regex
var regex = testString.match(/.+((?=\n)|$)/g) var value1 = regex[0]; var value2 = regex[1]; var value3 = regex[2];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Splitting
Regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches: splitting a string using `split()` and using regular expressions (`regex`). **Split() vs Regex** The test case uses a string `testString` containing multiple newlines (`\n`). The goal is to split this string into individual lines and extract the first three values. **Split() Approach** ```javascript var values = testString.split("\n"); var value1 = values[0]; var value2 = values[1]; var value3 = values[2]; ``` Pros: * Simple and straightforward approach. * Well-supported by most browsers. Cons: * May not be efficient for very large strings, as it creates an array of substrings and then extracts the desired elements. * Can be slower than regex for certain edge cases. **Regex Approach** ```javascript var regex = testString.match(/.+((?=\\n)|$)/g); var value1 = regex[0]; var value2 = regex[1]; var value3 = regex[2]; ``` Pros: * More flexible and powerful approach, allowing for matching multiple patterns or capturing groups. * Can be more efficient than splitting for very large strings. Cons: * Requires a deeper understanding of regular expressions, which can be complex and difficult to optimize. * May not work as expected in all browsers or environments (e.g., older browsers may have issues with regex). **Library: String.prototype.split()** The `split()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that splits an array-like object (including strings) into an array of substrings. This library is included in most browsers and Node.js environments. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** For splitting strings, other approaches include: * Using `String.prototype.split()` with a custom separator (e.g., `testString.split("|")`) * Using a library like `lodash.string` for string manipulation * Using a different string processing algorithm, such as using `Array.prototype.map()` or `Array.prototype.filter()` For regex, other approaches include: * Using `String.prototype.match()` with a custom pattern (e.g., `/[^\\n]+/g`) * Using a library like `lodash.regex` for regular expression manipulation * Using a different string processing algorithm, such as using `Array.prototype.map()` or `Array.prototype.filter()` Overall, the benchmark provides a simple and clear comparison between two approaches to splitting strings in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
String split using regex vs string v3
regex vs split lucas ribeiro
string.split(RegExp); vs string.split(string);
Javascript Split vs Regex
Js Split vs Regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?