Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
instanceof vs check attr
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
instanceof vs Check attr
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {a: "HELLO"}
Tests:
instanceof
obj instanceof Object
Check attr
obj.a === "HELLO"
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
instanceof
Check attr
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is tested on the provided JSON?** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark test case created using MeasureThat.net. The test case compares two approaches: 1. `instanceof` check: This approach uses the `instanceof` keyword to check if an object is of a specific type (in this case, `Object`). This method checks whether the object's constructor property matches the specified type. 2. Attribute comparison (`=== "HELLO"`): This approach compares the value of the attribute `a` with the string `"HELLO"` using the triple equals operator. **Options compared** The two options being compared are: * `instanceof` check: This method checks if an object is of a specific type. * Attribute comparison (`=== "HELLO"`): This method directly compares the value of an attribute with a string value. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **instanceof** check: * Pros: + Faster, as it only requires accessing the constructor property and comparing it to the specified type. + More efficient for large objects or arrays. * Cons: + May be slower than attribute comparison if the object has multiple properties, as it needs to access more data. 2. **Attribute comparison (`=== "HELLO"`):** * Pros: + Easier to understand and maintain, as it directly compares a specific value. + Can be faster for small objects or arrays, since it only requires accessing a single property. * Cons: + Slower than `instanceof` check due to the need to compare string values using a slow algorithm (string comparison). + May not perform as well on large objects or arrays. **Library and its purpose:** In this test case, none of the libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines may use internal libraries or optimizations that could affect the benchmark results. **Special JS features or syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this test case. The only notable feature is the use of `instanceof`, which is a built-in operator in JavaScript. **Other alternatives:** If you want to explore alternative approaches, here are some options: 1. **Using `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, 'a')`**: This approach checks if an object has a specific property using the `hasOwnProperty()` method. 2. **Using `obj.constructor === Object`**: This approach uses the constructor property of an object to check its type. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as efficient or relevant as the original `instanceof` and attribute comparison approaches, depending on your specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
instanceof vs undefined prop
instanceof vs typeof for objects
JS instanceof vs in
instanceof vs typeof franco
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?