Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
multiplication vs parseInt
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
multiplication vs parseInt
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
multiplication
const num = 10 * (10 ** 2) + 10
parseInt
const num = parseInt("10" + "10")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
multiplication
parseInt
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain the benchmark and its options. The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on MeasureThat.net. The test compares two approaches: multiplication and using the `parseInt` function to concatenate strings and then parse them as integers. **Multiplication Approach** In this approach, the number is calculated by multiplying `10` with `(10 ** 2)`. This uses exponentiation (the `**` operator) to calculate the square of `10`, which is a common pattern in mathematics. The result is added to `10`. Pros: * Simple and straightforward calculation * No need to create intermediate strings or parse values Cons: * May not take advantage of browser-specific optimizations for string concatenation and parsing * May be slower due to the use of exponentiation, which can be a more expensive operation than simple multiplication **parseInt Approach** In this approach, two separate operations are performed: string concatenation (`"10" + "10"`), followed by parsing the resulting string as an integer using `parseInt`. This approach requires creating intermediate strings and performing additional work. Pros: * May take advantage of browser-specific optimizations for string concatenation and parsing * Can be faster due to the optimized execution of these operations Cons: * Requires more computational steps, which can lead to slower performance * Creates intermediate strings, which may increase memory usage **Other Considerations** When evaluating these approaches, it's essential to consider factors like: * Browser-specific optimizations: Different browsers may optimize string concatenation and parsing differently, affecting the performance of each approach. * Compiler optimizations: Modern JavaScript engines use various compiler optimizations, such as inlining and dead code elimination. These optimizations can impact the performance of each approach. **Library or Special JS Feature** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, the use of exponentiation (`10 ** 2`) may be a feature specific to modern JavaScript engines, which supports this syntax since ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Alternative Approaches** Other possible approaches could include: * Using a more efficient data type, such as ` BigInt`, for the calculation * Breaking down the calculation into smaller, more manageable pieces and executing them in series * Using a different mathematical operation, such as using the `Math.sqrt` function to calculate the square root and then squaring the result Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would likely have different pros and cons compared to the original multiplication and parseInt approaches.
Related benchmarks:
parseInt vs parseFloat vs number vs multiply vs +
Number vs Number.parseInt vs parseInt
parseInt() VS x.toFixed()
multiplication vs parseInt vs Number vs bitwise
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?