Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
createComment vs cloneNode
(version: 0)
Faster way to create new dom comments before insertion
Comparing performance of:
createComment vs cloneNode
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var MAX_ITERATIONS = 100000;
Tests:
createComment
const list = []; for(let i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) { list.push(document.createComment('this is a comment')); }
cloneNode
const src = document.createComment('this is a comment'); const list = []; for(let i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) { list.push(src.cloneNode()); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
createComment
cloneNode
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and analyze the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to create new DOM comments: `document.createComment()` and `cloneNode()`. Specifically, it tests how fast each approach can add a large number (100,000) of identical comments to a list. **Options compared** There are two main options being compared: 1. **`document.createComment()`**: This method creates a new DOM comment element directly from the document object. 2. **`cloneNode()`**: This method creates a copy of an existing node in the document tree, but can be used to create a new comment by cloning the `Document COMMENT_NODE` node. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **`document.createComment()`**: * Pros: Creates a new DOM comment element directly from the document object, which might be more efficient since it doesn't require cloning an existing node. * Cons: Requires creating multiple objects in memory, which can lead to higher memory usage and potentially slower performance for large numbers of comments. 2. **`cloneNode()`**: * Pros: Creates a copy of an existing node (in this case, the `Document.COMMENT_NODE` node), which is likely to be more efficient since it only creates one object in memory per comment. * Cons: Requires cloning an existing node, which can lead to slower performance compared to creating a new object directly. **Other considerations** The benchmark also considers the use of JavaScript features and syntax, but in this case, none are apparent. The test code uses standard JavaScript syntax and does not include any advanced or experimental features. **Library usage** There is no explicit mention of any libraries being used in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that `Document.COMMENT_NODE` is a constant defined on the global `Document` object, which suggests that the benchmark may be using a specific implementation of the DOM API. **Special JS feature or syntax** None are mentioned in this specific benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
createElement vs cloneNode v3
createElement vs deep cloneNode vs cloneNode
createTextNode vs cloneNode asdf not deep
createElement vs cloneNode for comments
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?