Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
swap test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
2017 swap vs 1824 swap
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
2017 swap
let swap = ([a, b]) => [b, a]; let inArr = [5, 7]; let outArr = swap(inArr); console.log(outArr[0], outArr[1]);
1824 swap
let inA = 5; let inB = 7; inA ^= inB; inB ^= inA; inA ^= inB; console.log(inA, inB);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
2017 swap
1824 swap
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and benchmark code to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark tests two different ways of swapping values in an array. The goal is to compare the performance of these two approaches. **Approach 1: Using Array Destructuring** ```javascript let swap = ([a, b]) => [b, a]; let inArr = [5, 7]; let outArr = swap(inArr); console.log(outArr[0], outArr[1]); ``` In this approach, we define a function `swap` that takes an array as an argument and returns a new array with the elements swapped. We then create an input array `inArr`, pass it to the `swap` function, and store the result in `outArr`. Finally, we log the swapped values. **Approach 2: Using XOR Operator** ```javascript let inA = 5; let inB = 7; inA ^= inB; inB ^= inA; inA ^= inB; console.log(inA, inB); ``` In this approach, we use the XOR operator (`^`) to swap the values of two variables. The XOR operator has a property that `a ^ b` is equal to `b ^ a`, which allows us to swap the values without using a temporary variable. **Pros and Cons** * **Approach 1 (Array Destructuring)**: + Pros: Easy to read and understand, explicit swapping of elements. + Cons: Creates a new array, which can be memory-intensive for large inputs. * **Approach 2 (XOR Operator)**: + Pros: Memory-efficient, fast execution. + Cons: Less readable, requires understanding of XOR operator properties. **Library/Functionality** There is no library or external functionality used in these benchmarks. The only built-in function used is the `console.log` function for logging the output. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The XOR operator (`^`) is a special JavaScript operator that performs bit-wise XOR operation. It's not a commonly used feature, but it can be useful in specific situations like swapping values. **Other Alternatives** For swapping two variables without using a temporary variable, other approaches include: * Using `let temp = a; let b = c; a = b; b = temp;` (more verbose and slower) * Using `a = [b, a][0]; b = [b, a][1];` (creates a new array, similar to Approach 1) The benchmark's goal is to compare the performance of these two approaches and provide insights into their relative speed and memory usage.
Related benchmarks:
swap test
swap test
TEST SWAP FUNC
【JiangNanGame】traditional swap vs destructuring assignment swap
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?